This is particularly critical to climate and ecosystem relations. I got to know the wolverine fairly well-so to speak-during the Idaho forest-defense efforts in the 1990s. As with grizzly bears and tigers, wolverines are a wide-ranging, low-density species that require large tracts of pristine undeveloped wilderness for individuals to roam around in. As the article states-wolverines face threats from lessening snow-packs wrought by anthropogenic global heating-as well as from fragmentation of habitat by “development” of ANY kind. So listing the wolverine as endangered would not only help the species directly-but would ensure the protection of vast tracks of pristine undeveloped wilderness-which is critical to mitigating climate change and stabilizing the climate regime. The Bushies hate the ESA…
ASW
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 30, 2008 3:01 PM
CONTACT: Earthjustice
David Gaillard, Defenders of Wildlife, (406) 586-3970
Tim Preso, Earthjustice, (406) 586-9699
Joe Scott, Conservation Northwest, (360) 671-9950, ext.11
Noah Greenwald, Center for Biological Diversity, (503) 484-7495
Politics Overrules Biologists’ Views in Wolverine Decision
Conservation groups act to save imperiled species
MISSOULA, Mont. – September 30 – A recent federal decision refusing to protect wolverines in the western United States is a case of political considerations winning out over scientific findings by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service experts, according to a coalition of 10 conservation groups that filed suit today in U.S. district court. The groups are challenging the agency’s decision to deny wolverines protection under the Endangered Species Act.
Continue reading