U.S. Seeks to Gut 2001 Roadless Area Protection Rule!

In what’s left of roadless areas of the nation’s National Forests,  wildlife species
get some security from human disturbance, harassment  and killing. It goes without
saying that wildlife can sure use the  security, with or without the pressures
exerted by our new climate.  But homeland security for wildlife isn’t the only good
reason to keep  the remnant roadless roadless.

What’s left of the nation’s roadless areas also serve the creatures  we all know
best — people. It’s no secret that many Americans like  to get out of their cars
and away from roadside crowds to enjoy the  singular freedom of a walk in the wild
quiet of roadless woods. I’m  one. For me, homeland security means security for the
roadless forests too.
Lance
————————
“Last year, more than 140 House members and 19 senators introduced  the National
Forest RoadlessArea Conservation Act. It is past time to provide permanent
protection for the forests by turning the Clinton rule into firm law.”
————————–
The New York Times
August 21, 2008

Editorial
There Ought to Be a Roadless Law

Among President Bill Clinton’s signature environmental achievements  was a
regulation that prohibited new roads – and by extension, new  commercial activity –
in nearly 60 million largely undeveloped acres  of the national forests. For seven
years, the Bush administration,  egged on by its friends in the timber and
oil-and-gas industries, has  worked tirelessly to kill the roadless rule.
Conservationists have  worked just as hard to preserve it.

Continue reading

Climate, Development, Biodiversity, and Glacier National Park

Climate, Development, Biodiversity, and Glacier National Park
Glacier Park: The next century – Threats from all sides
By MICHAEL JAMISON of the Missoulian

WEST GLACIER – One hundred years ago, when Glacier National Park first became a
park, grizzly bears roamed along the spine of the Rocky
Mountains, north into Canada, south into Sun River country, west to the Cabinets and
east onto lowland plains. Wolves wandered, too, and
wolverines and big bull elk.

They had no idea someone had drawn a new political boundary onto their landscape.
They still don’t. “These critters move,” said park biologist Steve Gniadek. “It’s
critical they be able to cross in and out of the park.” But often they can’t, and
Gniadek has come to see Glacier as something of an island, an increasingly isolated
refugium surrounded by a growing moat of development.

Continue reading

Volcanic Eruptions and Climate Change

———————————————

A news blurb about recent increased volcanic
activity in Alaska renewed a question for me.
Then a new entry posted at Real Climate brought
the question even closer. And then an overview in
Science News put me over the brink, so here I’ll
stick my neck out.

My question comes in two parts. First, what
happens if we do find some safe and reasonable
way to “geoengineer” a cooling of the atmosphere,
only to find out with deep regret that we’ve set
ourselves up for a dangerous cooling — beyond
the intended, engineered cooling — when a
volcanic eruption deepens our engineered chill to
even deeper and, for many, to lethal levels?

Second, while even a major volcanic cooling is
widely accepted as a relatively temporary thing,
lasting only a few years if not only a few
months, might it relieve the heat in ways we
don’t dare voice aloud? Put crudely, my second
question is: Might some major and violent
volcanic eruption “save” us from the dangerous 3C
or 4C heat scenario by eliminating zillions of
consumer-emitters?
Lance

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
“So what are the problems? Robock’s study looks at
a subset of the potential ones – in particular, the impacts on
precipitation.”

A new entry titled ‘Climate change methadone?’
has been posted to RealClimate.org.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=593

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
“The eruption of Indonesia’s Tambora in 1815
triggered agricultural failures in North America
and Europe, caused the worst famine of the 19th
centuryŠ”

“Today, by comparison, the world’s surplus food
supply would last only about 90 days, a number
that’s steadily dropping as population increases
Š”

“What happens if another major eruption happens
today?” Verosub asks. “If we lower the growing
season globally, are we looking at a food crisis?
Š We’ve got a really stressed system, and if we
hit it hard, is it going to collapse? I think
that’s worth thinking about.”

Science News
August 30th, 2008; Vol.174 #5

Continue reading

Climate and Forests: Alaska and the Desert Southwest

Warming Climate Threatens Alaska’s Vast Forests

http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSN1928279720080819

——————————————————————————–

Climate Shift and SW fires

http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/printDS/253598

———————————————————————————