What the Greenwash Guerillas Said

At the end of the welcoming address of Point Carbon’s “Carbon Market Insights” conference on October 30th 2007, Rising Tide took the stage to present them with a deed to the sky:

Jessie: Before we begin we’d like to express how overjoyed we are at the opportunity to commend you all for undertaking the important work you are doing in taking care of the climate change problem”

Jessie: “we have a very special gift for all of you here, as the cutting edge of market based solutions to climate change we present to you a deed to the next frontier that is literally over all of your heads:”

David: “This indenture made on the 30th day of October in the year of our lord Two Thousand and Seven on behalf of the Secretary of the Sky bestows the full and rightful ownership of all parts of the atmosphere to the Carbon Traitors of Carbon Market Insights. Wittnesseth, that it be hereby known and proclaimed to all that the Carbon Traitors of Carbon Market Insights are recorded as the true and legal beneficiaries of the Sky and all its carbon existent or henceforth emitted and duly recorded by the Secretary of the Sky. We hold it to be self evident that all Greenhouse Gases are created equal, be they held in trees, pig shit, fossil fuels in the ground or combusted.

David: “so, thank you very much, we are also leaving with you a key to the sky
so that you are now the rightful owners, here is you deed.

David and Jessie:
“Generations of the future
Are begging us now
Renounce this treachery
Please spare this cash cow
So sink this idea
Offset your Illusions
There’s no market based quick-fix
for unchecked pollution

****applause***

Congressman Inslee: “So let’s hear it for the Sky Raiders here. I don’t know if I can top that”

NEW SCIENCE PAINTS GRIM PICTURE

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
VOL. 34, L19703, doi:10.1029/2007GL031018, 2007

Long term climate implications of 2050 emission reduction targets
Andrew J. Weaver, Kirsten Zickfeld, Alvaro Montenegro, and Michael Eby

Received 15 June 2007; revised 27 August 2007; accepted 7 September
2007; published 6 October 2007.

Abstract: A coupled atmosphere-ocean-carbon cycle model is used to
examine the long term climate implications of various 2050 greenhouse
gas emission reduction targets. All emission targets considered with
less than 60% global reduction by 2050 break the 2.0 threshold
warning this century, a number that some have argued represents an
upper bound on manageable climate warming. Even when emissions are
stabilized at 90% below present levels at 2050, this 2.0 threshold is
eventually broken. Our results suggest that if a 2.0  warming is to
be avoided, direct CO2 capture from the air, together with subsequent
sequestration, would eventually have to be introduced in addition to
sustained 90% global carbon emissions reductions by 2050.

========================================

—————————————————————————————————
“Eighty years from now warming temperatures will shift climatic
conditions up to seven degrees in latitude, Aitken says. So trees in
Prince George, B.C., for example, will weather summers and winters
indigenous to places like Idaho with potentially harmful effects.”

“We want to plant trees that will be healthy and grow well, but
conditions are going to change throughout their lifetime,” Aitken
says. “If you move trees north early on, the seedlings will die from
cold-related injury. But if you plant them where they’re well adapted
as seedlings now, in 60 years where it’s four degrees warmer, mature
trees may not be well-adapted. We don’t know how to target that yet.”
—————————————————–

The London Free Press (Canada)
October 28, 2007

Moving targets a challenge
By VIVIAN SONG, NATIONAL BUREAU

YELLOWKNIFE — When Kevin Kennedy saw the unfamiliar four-legged
animal saunter past his living room window, he went through a mental
checklist of what it could have been.

“My mind went through all the possibilities,” said the seven-year
Yellowknife resident and city councillor.

The animal was a coyote, a normally south-dwelling animal that, up to
a few years ago, was a stranger to these parts. But sightings of
animals never seen in Yellowknife before have been on the rise, like
white-tailed deer, cougars and magpies which are migrating further
from their traditional habitats.

Experts warn that climate change could push Canada’s tree line north
by as much as 750 km in some areas, and bring with it new species
while pushing old ones out.

“That will reduce the space for tundra and the wildlife it supports,”
points out Stewart Cohen, a senior researcher at Environment Canada.
“Alpine trees may also be squeezed out if trees move to higher and
higher elevations.”

An increasing frequency of fires is expected to cut swaths through
the fir, jack pine, and black and white spruce trees which dominate
the boreal forest. Meanwhile, deciduous species like the leafy aspen,
birch and poplar are projected to succeed their needly predecessors
and change the face of the largely coniferous boreal forest in the
next 50 years.

“As trees become more dense because a warmer climate allows them to
grow taller, it will shift the ecosystem and plant species,” explains
Tom Lakusta, forest manager with the government of the Northwest
Territories.

Subspecies of the black and white spruce, which grow in northern
Alberta and Ontario, may also become better suited to the soils of
their northern cousins, Lakusta says, and creep farther north.

According to Environment Canada, warmer temperatures will force sugar
maple production in Quebec to shift northwards by two degrees of
latitude over the next century. Already, sap flow has started up to
one month earlier over the last decade and production seasons are
shorter.

“One of the big challenges is we’re trying to hit a moving target,”
says Sally Aitken, director of the Centre for Forest Gene
Conservation at the University of British Columbia.

Eighty years from now warming temperatures will shift climatic
conditions up to seven degrees in latitude, Aitken says. So trees in
Prince George, B.C., for example, will weather summers and winters
indigenous to places like Idaho with potentially harmful effects.

“The problem with climate change is that tree species are going to be
in the wrong places … there’s going to be a big mismatch between
the trees and their local environment,” Aitken says.

That presents a conundrum for forest conservationists.

“We want to plant trees that will be healthy and grow well, but
conditions are going to change throughout their lifetime,” Aitken
says. “If you move trees north early on, the seedlings will die from
cold-related injury. But if you plant them where they’re well adapted
as seedlings now, in 60 years where it’s four degrees warmer, mature
trees may not be well-adapted. We don’t know how to target that yet.”

=====================================================================