Fish Populations Critical to Reef Climate Survival

Fish key to reef climate survival
By Richard Black
Environment correspondent, BBC News website

Life on the Reef

In pictures
A healthy fish population could be the key to ensuring coral reefs survive the impacts
of climate change, pollution, overfishing and other threats.

Australian scientists found that some fish act as “lawnmowers”, keeping coral free of
kelp and unwanted algae.

At a briefing to parliamentarians in Canberra, they said protected areas were rebuilding
fish populations in some parts of the Great Barrier Reef.

Warming seas are likely to affect the reef severely within a few decades.

Pollution is also a growing problem, particularly fertilisers that wash from agricultural
land into water around the reef, stimulating the growth of plants that stifle the coral.

Protect and survive

The assembled experts told parliamentarians that fish able to graze on invading plants
played a vital role in the health of reef ecosystems.

Because sea temperatures are now a lot higher, they are now reaching the thresholds at
which coral get into distress.

Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, University of Queensland, said:
“The Great Barrier Reef is still a resilient system… and herbivorous fish play a
critical role in that regenerative capacity, by keeping the dead coral space free of
algae, so that new juvenile coral can re-establish themselves,” said Professor Terry
Hughes from James Cook University in Townsville.

His research group has conducted experiments which involved building cages to keep fish
away from sections of reef.

They found that three times as much new coral developed in areas where the fish were
present as in the caged portions.

Parrotfish in particular use their serrated jaws to scrape off incipient algae and plants.

More recently, his team has also identified the rabbit fish – a brown, bland-looking
species – as a potentially important harvester of seaweed.

“So managing fisheries can help to maintain the reef’s resilience to future climate
change,” he said.

The parrotfish performs a vital role as a “lawnmower” of the reef.

In recent years, Marine Protected Areas have been set up along the Great Barrier Reef
in order to provide sanctuaries where fish and other marine creatures can grow and develop.

Dr Peter Doherty from the Australian Institute of Marine Science presented data showing
that just two years of protection brought significant increases in populations of important
species such as coral trout and tropical snapper.

“More importantly, more eggs are being produced… nearly three times the number of eggs per
unit area being produced in the surrounding territory,” he said.

The eggs, he showed, travelled well outside the boundaries of the protected zones,
potentially increasing fish populations in non-protected areas too.

Burning issue

The scientists emphasised that a comprehensive approach to reef protection would include
measures to lower greenhouse gas emissions and to reduce run-off from agricultural land
and human settlements along the coast.

“You have got a three- to nine-fold increase in sediment loss,” said Professor Iain Gordon
from the governmental research organisation CSIRO.

“[There are] increases in nutrients that feed into the system, nitrates and phosphates and
also new kinds of chemicals in the water that is around the reef; pesticides and herbicides,
they haven’t been there before.”

Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg from the University of Queensland noted that unusually warm
water in 1998 and 2002 had bleached and damaged coral in southern parts of the Barrier Reef.

High water temperatures cause coral to bleach, sometimes irreversibly.

“The reef literally goes from being brown and healthy to being a stark white, and this
happens with very small changes in temperature,” he said.

In the past, he said, bleaching events happened only at the warm extremes of natural cycles
such as El Nino; but now the overall water temperature is higher, which makes the peaks of
the cycles more harmful to coral.

“Because sea temperatures are now a lot higher, they are now reaching the thresholds at
which coral get into distress, and of course it is really large scale impacts.”

At high temperatures, coral polyps expel the algae which normally live with them in a
symbiotic relationship, turning the reef white. The algae typically provide most of the
polyp’s nutrition; without them, the polyps eventually die.

Even if a bleached zone contains live polyps and carries the potential to recover when waters
cool, a quick invasion of kelp, or types of algae that do not live symbiotically with coral,
can make the die-off permanent – hence the protective role of plant-munchng fish.

The Great Barrier Reef is worth about six billion Australian dollars (US$5.5bn; £2.8bn) to the
national economy, primarily through tourism and fishing.

Richard.Black-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk

—————————————————————————————–

Climate Change Deepening World Water Crisis

Published on Thursday, March 20, 2008 by Inter Press Service
Climate Change Deepening World Water Crisis
by Thalif Deen

UNITED NATIONS – When U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon addressed the World
Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland last January, his primary focus was not
on the impending global economic recession but on the world’s growing water
crisis.0320 08

“A shortage of water resources could spell increased conflicts in the future,”
he told the annual gathering of business tycoons, academics and leaders from
governments, intergovernmental and non-governmental organisations.

“Population growth will make the problem worse. So will climate change. As the
global economy grows, so will its thirst. Many more conflicts lie just over
the horizon,” he warned.

Anders Berntell, executive director of the Stockholm International Water
Institute, says the lack of safe drinking water for over 1.0 billion people
worldwide, and the lack of safe sanitation for over 2.5 billion, “is an acute
and devastating humanitarian crisis.”

“But this is a crisis of management, not a water crisis per se, because it is
caused by a chronic lack of funding and inadequate understanding of the need
for sanitation and good hygiene at the local level,” Berntell told IPS.

He said: “This can and must be fixed through improved governance and management,
and increased funding, and sustained efforts to achieve the U.N.’s Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs),” which include the eradication of extreme poverty and
hunger and adequate water and sanitation.

A U.N. study released on the eve of World Water Day Mar. 22 says the lack of safe
drinking water is not confined to the world’s poorer nations; it also threatens
over 100 million Europeans.

The result: nearly 40 children in Europe, mostly in Eastern Europe, die every day
due to a water-related disease: diarrhoea.

In Eastern Europe, about 16 percent of the population still does not have access
to drinking water in their homes, while in rural areas, over half of all people
suffer from the lack of safe water and adequate sanitation.

“The world water crisis is definitely very bad, particularly because it deals with
mismanagement of water and how governments have failed to secure the involvement
of local communities in the management of water,” says Sunita Narain, director of
the New Delhi-based Centre for Science and Environment, and the 2005 winner of the
prestigious annual Stockholm Water Prize.

“We, as societies, have failed to use small amounts of water for bringing large
productivity gains,” she said.

However, today the world water crisis faces yet another challenge — one of climate
change, Narain told IPS.

“And it is this challenge which the world is completely failing to do anything
about, and which will jeopardise the water security of large numbers of people,
who already live on the margins of survival,” she declared.

Responding to a question, Berntell admitted there is a “world water crisis”
judging by the number of people without safe drinking water and basic sanitation.

And this, he said, “in a world which has the financial wealth and technical
wherewithal to solve these twin scandals”.

“We must find better ways to manage water resources, in so far as water pollution
is concerned, and to meet the food requirements of a human population which will
expand by over 3.0 billion people in 2050.”

“We also must meet the water-climate challenge. Everything could become much more
desperate and severe in the future if the proper steps are not taken,” he added.

So, it is important, Berntell argued, to make a distinction between the water
resource crisis — which is primarily caused by an overexploitation of water
resources for agricultural and industrial use, as well as pollution — and the water
service and sanitation crisis.

In a statement released Wednesday, the International Union for Conservation of
Nature (IUCN) said many rivers in developing countries and emerging economies are
now polluted to the brink of their collapse.

“The Yangtze, China’s longest river, is cancerous with pollution due to untreated
agriculture and industrial waste,” IUCN warned

Meanwhile, arguing that water shortages will drive future conflicts, the U.N.
secretary-general says the slaughter in Darfur — described as “genocide” by the
United States — was triggered by global climate change.

“It is no accident that the violence in Darfur erupted during the drought,” Ban
said. When Darfur’s land was rich, black farmers welcomed Arab herders and shared
their water.

With the drought, however, farmers fenced in their land to prevent overgrazing.
“For the first time in memory, there was no longer enough food and water for all.
Fighting broke out,” he said.

“Water is a classic common property resource. No one really owns the problem.
Therefore, no one really owns the solution,” he declared.

Asked if the United Nations and the international community are doing enough to
help resolve the problem or even draw attention to it, Narain told IPS:
“Definitely there has been an attempt over the last few years to understand both
the nature of the crisis as well as to draw attention to it.”

“However, I believe that the international community’s understanding of what needs
to be done to resolve the water crisis has been both weak as well as misplaced.”

The reason, she pointed out, “is that the international community does not
understand water and how it affects local communities and, therefore, the United
Nations and the international community is looking for quick fix technological
solutions to what is primarily a governance issue.”

Berntell took a different perspective. “Unquestionably,” he said, “water, and in
particular sanitation, remain far too low on the international agenda.”

Access to clean water and sanitation underpin all human development efforts, and
water issues are central to climate change adaptation and sustainable development.
“But much more needs to be done to address the spectrum of challenges,” he told IPS.

The U.N. system, and the “UN-Water” collaborative effort in particular, works
extremely hard and well and is consistently improving its efforts to better
coordinate and make more effective its work, he said.

The U.N.’s declaration of 2008 as the International Year of Sanitation has catalysed
increased action and attention to critical health and hygiene issues this year,
Berntell added.

“Still, the U.N. must strengthen its efforts to coordinate its monitoring and
reporting. They cannot afford to continue delivering too many reports on overlapping
issues at the same time.”

A good starting point, he said, would be the “five ones” identified by Britain: one
annual global monitoring report; one high-level global ministerial meeting on water;
at country level, one national plan for water and sanitation; one coordinating body;
and activities of U.N. agencies on water and sanitation to be coordinated by one lead
body under the U.N. Development Programme (UNDP) and its country plan.

© 2008 Inter Press Service

—————————————————————————————

Plum Creek Offers Up No Changes In Post-Hearing Brief

The ball is in LURC’s (Land Use Reg Commission) court…can’t wait to see
what they do w/ this now.

ASW

—————————- Original Message —————————-
Subject: Plum Creek Offers Up No Changes In Post-Hearing Brief
From:    “Jym St. Pierre” <jym@restore.org>
Date:    Tue, March 18, 2008 12:44 pm
To:      undisclosed-recipients: Undisclosed recipients;
————————————————————————–

For Release Tuesday, March 18, 2008 – 10:30 a.m.
Contacts:
Judy Berk, NRCM (207) 622-3101 X 203 (o)
Elyse Tipton, Maine Audubon (207) 781-2330, ext. 229 or (207) 632-8389

Despite Overwhelming Public Criticism of Moosehead Plan
Plum Creek Offers Up No Changes In Post-Hearing Brief

AUGUSTA, March 18, 2008 —Maine’s two leading environmental
organizations said today that Plum Creek, the nation’s largest
commercial landowner, has submitted a post-hearing brief that
dismissed long lists of concerns raised during hundreds of hours of
public testimony by Maine residents and technical experts about Plum
Creek’s plan to develop the Moosehead Lake region.

The executive directors of Maine Audubon and the Natural Resources
Council of Maine (NRCM) provided their analysis of the hearing record
and public comments on Plum Creek’s proposal at a news conference in
Augusta.

Continue reading

Climate Change, Bamboo Forests, & Pandas

http://news.scotsman.com/latestnews/Front-line-of-the-fight.3896776.jp

CLIMATE change is threatening the giant panda. There are fears that
the bamboo on which the panda depends may be at risk from global
warming. Botanists at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE) are
collaborating with colleagues in China in a project to help secure
the long-term survival of the giant panda. They are identifying and
surveying bamboo species in the mountains of China. Climate data will
then be used to predict how these areas will be affected by climate
change. The RBGE is also involved in research to predict and monitor
the impact of climate change on Scotland’s native plants. Plants such
as mosses, lichens and ferns are often extremely sensitive to
climatic conditions.

http://news.scotsman.com/latestnews/Front-line-of-the-fight.3896776.jp

—————————————————————–