————————————————
“The rainiest year was 2005, followed by 2004,
1998, 2003 and 2002, respectively.”

“The rainfall increase was concentrated over
tropical oceans, with a slight decline over land.”
——————————-

NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
Public release date: 27-Aug-2007

Contact: Lynn Chandler
lynn.chandler-1@nasa.gov
301-286-2806

Long-term increase in rainfall seen in tropics

NASA scientists have detected the first signs
that tropical rainfall is on the rise with the
longest and most complete data record available.

Using a 27-year-long global record of rainfall
assembled by the international scientific
community from satellite and ground-based
instruments, the scientists found that the
rainiest years in the tropics between 1979 and
2005 were mainly since 2001. The rainiest year
was 2005, followed by 2004, 1998, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.

“When we look at the whole planet over almost
three decades, the total amount of rain falling
has changed very little. But in the tropics,
where nearly two-thirds of all rain falls, there
has been an increase of 5 percent,” says lead
author Guojun Gu, a research scientist at Goddard
Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. The
rainfall increase was concentrated over tropical
oceans, with a slight decline over land.

Climate scientists predict that a warming trend
in Earth’s atmosphere and surface temperatures
would produce an accelerated recycling of water
between land, sea and air. Warmer temperatures
increase the evaporation of water from the ocean
and land and allow air to hold more moisture.
Eventually, clouds form that produce rain and
snow.

“A warming climate is the most plausible cause of
this observed trend in tropical rainfall,” says
co-author Robert F. Adler, senior scientist at
Goddard’s Laboratory for Atmospheres. Adler and
Gu are now working on a detailed study of the
relationship between surface temperatures and
rainfall patterns to further investigate the
possible link. The study appears in the Aug. 1,
2007, issue of the American Meteorological
Society’s Journal of Climate.

Obtaining a global view of our planet’s rainfall
patterns is a challenging work-in-progress. Only
since the satellite era have regular estimates of
rainfall over oceans been available to supplement
the long-term but land-limited record from rain
gauges. Just recently have the many land- and
space-based data been merged into a single global
record endorsed by the international scientific
community: the Global Precipitation Climatology
Project, sponsored by the World Climate Research
Program. Adler’s research group at NASA produces
the project’s monthly rainfall updates, which are
available to scientists worldwide.

Using this global record, Gu, Adler and their
colleagues identified a small upward trend in
overall tropical rainfall since 1979, but their
confidence was not high that this was an actual
long-term trend rather than natural year-to-year
variability. So they took another look at the
record and removed the effects of the two major
natural phenomena that change rainfall: the El
Niño-Southern Oscillation and large volcanic
eruptions.

El Niño is a cyclical warming of the ocean waters
in the central and eastern tropical Pacific that
generally occurs every three to seven years and
alters weather patterns worldwide. Volcanoes that
loft debris into the upper troposphere and
stratosphere create globe-circling bands of
aerosol particles that slow the formation of
precipitation by increasing the number of small
cloud drops and temporarily shielding the planet
from sunlight, which lowers surface temperatures
and evaporation that fuels rainfall. Two such
eruptions – El Chicon in Mexico and Mount
Pinatubo in the Philippines – occurred during the
27-year period.

The scientists found that during El Niño years,
total tropical rainfall did not change
significantly but more rain fell over oceans than
usual. The two major volcanoes both reduced
overall tropical rainfall by about 5 percent
during the two years following each eruption.
With these effects removed from the rainfall
record, the long-term trend appears more clearly
in both the rainfall data over land and over the
ocean.

According to Adler, evidence for the rainfall
trend is holding as more data come in. The latest
numbers for 2006 show another record-high year
for tropical rainfall, tying 2005 as the rainiest
year during the period.

“The next step toward firmly establishing this
initial indication of a long-term tropical
rainfall trend is to continue to lengthen and
improve our data record,” says Adler, who is
project scientist of the Tropical Rainfall
Measuring Mission (TRMM), a joint mission between
NASA and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency.
The three primary instruments on TRMM are
currently providing the most detailed view of
rainfall ever provided from space. Adler’s group
has been incorporating TRMM rainfall data since
1997 into the global rainfall record.

NASA plans to extend TRMM’s success of monitoring
rainfall over the tropics to the entire globe
with the Global Precipitation Measurement
mission, scheduled for launch in 2013. This
international project will provide measurements
of both rain and snow around the world with
instruments on a constellation of spacecraft
flying in different orbits.
###

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2007/rainfall_increase.html

Written By: Steve Cole Goddard Space Flight Center

IPCC CHAIR INTERVIEWED: CLIMATE CHANGE AND INDIA
OneWorld.net
OneWorld South Asia

Climate change inevitably affects India’s wildlife and ecosystems
http://southasia.oneworld.net/article/view/152403/1/5339

Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, Chairman of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) and the head of The Energy and Resources
Institute (TERI) was born in Nainital and studied in Lucknow. Trained
as an engineer with the Indian Railways, he did his Masters in
Industrial Engineering and subsequently obtained a Ph.D in Industrial
Engineering and then a Ph.D in Economics at the North Carolina State
University, U.S. In a freewheeling discussion with Bittu Sahgal on
climate change, he discusses how this could affect India and suggests
steps to adapt to and mitigate climate threats

You are arguably one of the most influential academicians on the
planet today. What started you on this path?

Well, my father was an educationist with a Ph.D in Psychology from
London University and my mother was a housewife, but a graduate with
a great fondness for reading and studying everything under the sun.
My parents gifted me with the desire to learn and the ability to act
on what I learned. They also taught me to respect the opinions of
those who disagreed with me, which is vital to conflict resolution or
collective action.

Who were the key influences in your life and when did climate change
take over your life?

Apart from my parents, my elder brother Lt. Col. V. K. Pachauri was a
deep influence on my personality. I was very close to him, and miss
him greatly because he died young. From him, I learned multi-tasking
and combining work with sports. Prof. Kenneth Boulding and Prof.
Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen helped shape my horizons in economics. Both
these distinguished economists were ahead of their time and
highlighted the perils of the path of growth and development that the
world was pursuing. Subsequently, I worked on energy and
environmental issues. I got deeply interested in climate change in
1988, and have followed both the scientific and political aspects of
this subject ever since.

You must be happy with the outcome of the IPCC report. Was it
difficult to arrive at a consensus on the final draft of the report?

I will really be happy only when I see our recommendations widely
implemented. Arriving at a consensus on IPCC reports is always
difficult, but the three Working Groups Reports that have been
approved so far were finally accepted with some minor modifications
and refinements. Consensus took longer than expected, but in the end
worked out very well.

What are the most dangerous implications of climate change for India?

Increasing floods and droughts, growing scarcity of water, the
effects of sea level rise and negative impacts on agricultural
productivity.

That’s a frightening list. Would such circumstances, which will
surely lead to resource deprivation, not contribute to social unrest?

Yes. India’s internal security itself could be seriously threatened
by extreme weather events, including tidal surges and high-intensity
hurricanes that might damage infrastructural support systems – wells,
farms, roads, bridges upon which social order ultimately rests. Water
scarcity is the hand-maiden of climate change and would aggravate
social unrest to the point where national security could be affected.
It’s not that this is inevitable. Just that it is possible, and we
should prepare for all contingencies.

Have any ‘what if’ scenarios been worked out for India, for instance,
how many people would need to be evacuated from the 24 Parganas
District alone, with a one metre rise in sea level? Also what happens
when Himalayan glaciers melt?

Detailed ‘what if’ scenarios have not been worked out for India.
There is need for such analysis and for understanding the kind of
water regime we would be faced with in different parts of the
country. In West Bengal’s 24 Parganas, Orissa and other coastal
states, we could be confronted with a refugee crisis, while in mega
cities like Mumbai we could suffer unthinkable losses. Delhi and much
of north India, which depends on glacial water, would be seriously
affected too. Economists have a lot of homework to do!

Do you see a situation where the public in India – farmers and
coastal fisherfolk, for instance – will turn on their leaders for not
bringing climate change threats to their notice sooner?

I foresee that our children and grandchildren who would know much
more about climate change and who would feel its impacts to a much
greater extent would hold us responsible for inaction. This would
include not only farmers and coastal fisherfolk but also people in
other professions and locations. We owe not only to future
generations but this generation itself, a set of urgent action that
can help contain the undesirable impacts of climate change.

What major priorities do you feel we need to change to inure
ourselves from the impacts of climate change?

We need to bring about a drastic shift in our lifestyles, which would
favour much greater use of public transport, construction of
buildings that are energy efficient and conversion of existing ones
in the same direction as well as a clear plan of action to adapt to
the impacts of climate change in the short and long term.

Do you agree with Dr. Nicholas Stern’s view that action today will
cost one per cent of GDP while inaction could end up costing over 20
per cent?

I think India’s cost of action today would be even lower than one per
cent of the GDP and the cost of inaction substantially higher. Also,
if the Earth’s atmosphere is not stabilised, human lives will be lost
and no price can be attached to such losses.

And our biodiversity? How do you think climate change will affect
India’s wildlife and ecosystems?

Climate change will inevitably accelerate the loss of species from
snow leopards and tigers to elephants and amphibians. Ecosystems
across the planet will also be affected. Each day scientists are
discovering new information on the interdependency between the
planet, its atmosphere and wild flora and fauna. It’s a feedback loop
upon which all life on Earth is dependent. Such impacts cannot be
expressed in economic terms.

Though 20 per cent of all greenhouse gases originate from
deforestation, the Kyoto Protocol does not incentivise tropical
forests and ecosystem protection. Meanwhile, carbon trading regimes
allow one polluter to pay another, even as carbon emissions spin out
of control.

It’s a problem that experts are grappling with as we speak.
Deforestation-caused emissions have been called the ‘elephant in the
room’ and unless we find a way to protect natural ecosystems, whose
services extend much beyond mere carbon sequestration, the climate
crisis will not be reined in.

India plans to enhance its coal-fired thermal plant capacity by 300
per cent in the coming decade and some suggest that nuclear reactors
could solve the carbon-free energy-climate change conundrum.

India’s energy imperatives are a key argument at international
negotiating tables. New technology to recover carbon emissions and
store such carbon underground might allow for options we may not have
contemplated just a few years ago. But as a nation that stands to
lose dramatically more than most from an out-of-control climate
situation, India’s think-tank is not likely to underestimate the
consequences of business as usual. As for the nuclear deal with the
United States, even if it does go through it would lift nuclear
power, which provides three per cent of India’s energy, to no more
than nine per cent, according to Dr. Leena Srivastava, Executive
Director at TERI.

Presumably, such issues will be flagged prominently because you have
been invited by the Prime Minister to advise him on climate change
impacts. What is likely to be the thrust of your message?

It’s a complicated issue, but at the core must be the acceptance that
climate change is not a distant worry. It is already here. There is
not a single part of the planet that will be unaffected and we need
to educate our people about the likely impacts, particularly the
water crisis. Also that financially, the cost of inaction will be
much higher than the cost of action taken today.

But India seems to be stating to the world that its developmental
ambitions cannot and will not be held hostage to global negotiations
on climate change.

In a certain sense, it’s a valid position to take, but India’s
leaders, economists, planners and thinkers may need to rethink
developmental strategies. Possibly redefine development in light of
new climate change realities.

Is this likely?

India has a great headstart on most industrial nations because our
people have an innate – almost religious – respect for nature. This
easily allows them to accept its supremacy over humans. At another
level, much more of our national resources, both financial and human,
must be devoted to research and development on future technologies –
more efficient vehicles, vastly-improved public transport (France is
testing a high-speed train that runs at 574 km./hour). Such
investments will enhance job security, and improve the quality of
human life.

What next?

We need to win consensus for India’s policy frameworks to incorporate
key IPCC findings. This done, hopefully, coordinated climate change
action will follow.

Source: Sanctuary Asia
http://southasia.oneworld.net/article/view/152403/1/5339

GOOD CONDITIONS FOR ATLANTIC HURRICANES!
For continual updates on Sea Surface
Temperatures, please visit:
http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a003300/a003397/index.html

When asked what factors forecasters are watching,
Patzert said “The jet stream has remained
stubbornly north, the possibility of a
late-developing La Nina is lurking and Gulf of
Mexico and Caribbean sea surface temperatures are
ripe for late-season hurricane development.”
————————————-

NASA -National Aeronautics and Space Administration

FEATURE

NASA Eyes Current Sea Surface Temperatures For Hurricanes

08.16.07

Sea surface temperatures are one of the key
ingredients for tropical cyclone formation and
they were warming up in the Gulf of Mexico,
Caribbean and eastern Atlantic Ocean by the
middle of August. As a result, they helped spawn
Hurricane Dean in the central Atlantic, and
Tropical Storm Erin in the Gulf of Mexico, both
during the week of August 13.

By late June, sea surface temperatures in the
Gulf of Mexico were all over 80 degrees
Fahrenheit. That’s one thing that hurricane
forecasters watch for because sea surface
temperatures of 80 degrees Fahrenheit or warmer
are needed to power tropical depressions into
tropical storms and grow them into hurricanes.

These areas or warm sea surface waters (80
degrees F or higher) are depicted in yellow,
orange, and red. This data was taken by the
Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer – EOS
(AMSR-E) instrument aboard the Aqua satellite.
This animation updates every 24 hours.

This animation shows the progression of warm
waters slowly filling the Gulf of Mexico (shown
in yellow, orange, and red). This natural annual
warming contributes to the possible formation of
hurricanes in the Gulf. Sea surface temperature
data shown here ranges from January 1, 2007 to
the present.

NASA’s Bill Patzert, oceanographer at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. said,
“The many Atlantic and Gulf citizens still
reeling from the shock of the 2004 and 2005
Atlantic hurricane seasons, received some good
news Å  the Atlantic sea surface temperatures that
fuel hurricanes are somewhat cooler than the past
few years. Based on this, some forecasters have
reduced their forecasts. But the news is mixed.”

When asked what factors forecasters are watching,
Patzert said “The jet stream has remained
stubbornly north, the possibility of a
late-developing La Nina is lurking and Gulf of
Mexico and Caribbean sea surface temperatures are
ripe for late-season hurricane development.”

While the experts debate, Gulf and Atlantic coast
residents should definitely be prepared. A
forecast for an above or below average hurricane
season is just an academic exercise if a
community is hit.

Hurricane season ends on November 30.

For continual updates on Sea Surface
Temperatures, please visit:
http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a003300/a003397/index.html

Find this article at:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hurricanes/archives/2007/sst_hurr.html

Dr. James Hansen speaks on reticence within the climate-science community

————————————————————-
“Reticence is fine for the IPCC. And individual scientists can
choose to stay within a comfort zone, not needing to worry
that they say something that proves to be slightly wrong. But
perhaps we should also consider our legacy from a broader
perspective. Do we not know enough to say more?”

“Almost four decades ago Eipper (1970), in a section of his
paper titled ‘The Scientist’s Role’, provided cogent advice and
wisdom about the responsibility of scientists to warn the public
about the potential consequences of human activities. Eipper
recognized sources of scientific reticence, but he concluded
that scientists should not shrink from exercising their rights as
citizens and responsibilities as scientists.”
————————————————–

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Environ. Res. Lett. 2 (2007) 024002 (6pp) doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/2/024002

Scientific reticence and sea level rise
J E Hansen
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880
Broadway, New York, NY 10025, USA

Received 23 March 2007
Accepted for publication 3 May 2007
Published 24 May 2007
Online at stacks.iop.org/ERL/2/024002

Abstract
I suggest that a ‘scientific reticence’ is
inhibiting the communication of a threat of a
potentially large sea level rise. Delay is dangerous because
of system inertias that could create a situation
with future sea level changes out of our control.
I argue for calling together a panel of scientific
leaders to hear evidence and issue a prompt
plain-written report on current understanding of
the sea level change issue.

Continue reading