Fostering Better Forest Policy With Science

—————————————————————————————————————————————
Fostering Better Forest Policy With Science

By Cameron Naficy

A widespread notion is that fire suppression has greatly altered fire regimes across
the West and is therefore largely responsible for the large, severe wildfires
witnessed in recent years. This logic even lies at the base of national policies
such as the Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA) and Healthy Forests Initiative
(HFI) which emphasize widespread logging and prescribed fire to ameliorate the
effects of fire suppression and reduce the likelihood of large fires. However,
significant scientific debate exists about the extent and historical causes of forest change as well as the best management responses to these changes.

Recent studies have begun to highlight many potential dangers of rushing
headfirst into widespread logging and burning practices, as is currently advocated
by national policies. Just as fire suppression was thought to be a beneficial policy
for forest health and public safety and yet we now find ourselves in part the victim
of a century of fire suppression policies, we need to be sure that current thinning
and burning policies do not, in the long run, actually worsen the very problem they
aim to solve. In order to avoid such an outcome, solid scientific principles must
exist as the foundation of management policy and practice. Over the last several
years, the WildWest Institute has been working with forest ecologists at the
University of Montana to help fill the scientific gap at the base of current national forest policies. The following is a brief review of our research and other relevant scientific findings that should help to form the basis for forest management policies and practices on public lands.

Continue reading

Rising Tide UK / Art Not Oil defeats Shell!

Shell’s two year tenure as sponsor of the Natural History Museum’s
‘Wildlife Photographer of the Year’ exhibition has come to an end. A
determined, creative two year national campaign, coordinated in part by
the direct action group Rising Tide and its Art Not Oil (1) offshoot,
helped to force the NHM to ditch Shell.

Using a combination of creative direct action (2) and a ‘Shell’s Wild Lie’
exhibition (3), Rising Tide has been pressurising the Museum and partner
BBC Wildlife magazine to acknowledge that one of the world’s largest oil
companies is not a good sponsor for an exhibition that has become a
powerful testament to the beauty, diversity and fragility of the natural world.(4)

This campaign, and the significant public pressure it mobilised, has now paid off. Continue reading

Cascadia RT organizes anti-LNG action at NW Natural

Cascadia Rising Tide joined forces with Stumptown Earth First! to hold an action and rally at the downtown Portland office of NW Natural (local gas utility), for their involvement in Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) related pipelines, which threaten to clear-cut strips of forest throughout Oregon for new fossil fuel infrastructure.

Piling dozens of trees on NW Natural’s downtown office entryway, activists with Stumptown Earth First! and Cascadia Rising Tide, sent a message to the LNG-invested gas company: “There’s nothing Green about Clear-cuts, No new pipelines”. Continue reading

2007-08 La Nina to Continue Through the Spring

San Francisco Chronicle
Thursday, January 10, 2008

La Nina to Stay Through Spring
(01-10) 08:39 PST WASHINGTON, (AP) —

A moderate La Nina is expected to continue
through spring, bringing wet conditions to the
northern Rockies and continued dryness to the
Southeast, government climate experts said
Thursday.

La Nina is a cooling of the tropical Pacific
Ocean that can cause changes in weather patterns
around the world. It is the opposite of the
better-known El Nino, a periodic warming of the
same region.

The monthly update from the Climate Prediction
Center calls for the moderate La Nina to continue
into spring. Currently sea surface temperatures
range from 2 degrees to 3 degrees Fahrenheit
below normal in studied parts of the Pacific.
This reduces rainfall over the ocean, and there
are stronger-than-normal easterly winds blowing
at low levels.

That indicates the likelihood of above-average
precipitation over Indonesia and below-average
precipitation over the central and eastern
equatorial Pacific, forecasters said.

For the contiguous United States, potential
effects include above-average precipitation in
the northern Rockies, the Pacific Northwest, the
Ohio and Tennessee valleys, and parts of the
Great Lakes region. Below-average precipitation
is expected across most of the South,
particularly in the southeastern states.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/01/10/national/w083240S13.DTL
© 2008 Hearst Communications Inc.

=================================================