Indiana’s Wabash River Flooding-Again!

Hey Storm,

Well, we got just over 2.5″ of rain here in Lafayette, Indiana this past
Tuesday, with unbelievable thunderstorms!! Of course, that meant the
Wabash River is flooded again. It flooded at 22.5′ on January  8th, and
now that folks finally cleaned up their homes so that they could move back
into them have once again been evacuated. This time, the Wabash will crest
at 25 feet!  Here is an interesting stat:

Since January of 1960, there have been 10 large floods at Lafayette,
a span of 48 years. 8 of these large floods (out of 10) have occurred since
the SUMMER OF 2003!!! A span of only 4.5 years! This is statistically off
the charts.

As can be seen, the river floods basically Twice Every Year now, and not
once every 20 years or so, as it was between 1960 and 2002.

Later On!
Paul

————————————————————————

Bogus Charges Against NFN and RTNA Activists Dropped by State of Maine

***For Immediate Release***

Contact: Emily Posner, Native Forest Network, Organizer–207-930-5232

All Charges Dropped Against Activists Harassed by Plum Creek

On Monday, February 4th, Emily Posner, Alex Lundberg and John Waters
all received notice from the Piscataquis County Prosecutors Office
that their pending criminal trespassing charges were dropped.

The three are volunteers from Native Forest Network–Gulf of Maine
(NFN), a grass-roots statewide coalition of concerned citizens working
to conserve and restore Maine’s forest spaces-and 1 of them, an atmospheric scientist,  is also with Rising Tide North America. NFN is registered with
LURC as an intervenor in the Plum Creek rezoning proposal, and has
been participating in official hearings regarding the Seattle-based
company’s Concept Plan for the Moosehead Region. NFN supports a
stance of “No Compromise” in regards to Plum Creek’s proposed
development, claiming, “this type of project contributes to global
climate change, threatens the ecological integrity of the largest
undeveloped region east of the Mississippi River, and undermines the
rural heritage of the region.”

Continue reading

Insects Turn Canada’s Forests From Carbon Sinks to Carbon Sources

——————————————————
“The recent transition from sink to source
is the result of large insect outbreaks.”
————————————————

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA

PNAS | February 5, 2008 | vol. 105 | no. 5 | 1551-1555

OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/105/5/1551

Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada’s
forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain
Werner A. Kurz, Graham Stinson, Gregory J. Rampley, Caren C. Dymond,
and Eric T. Neilson

Abstract

A large carbon sink in northern land surfaces inferred from global
carbon cycle inversion models led to concerns during Kyoto Protocol
negotiations that countries might be able to avoid efforts to reduce
fossil fuel emissions by claiming large sinks in their managed
forests. The greenhouse gas balance of Canada’s managed forest is
strongly affected by naturally occurring fire with high interannual
variability in the area burned and by cyclical insect outbreaks.
Taking these stochastic future disturbances into account, we used the
Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS3) to
project that the managed forests of Canada could be a source of
between 30 and 245 Mt CO2e yr-1 during the first Kyoto Protocol
commitment period (2008-2012). The recent transition from sink to
source is the result of large insect outbreaks. The wide range in the
predicted greenhouse gas balance (215 Mt CO2e yr-1) is equivalent to
nearly 30% of Canada’s emissions in 2005. The increasing impact of
natural disturbances, the two major insect outbreaks, and the Kyoto
Protocol accounting rules all contributed to Canada’s decision not to
elect forest management. In Canada, future efforts to influence the
carbon balance through forest management could be overwhelmed by
natural disturbances. Similar circumstances may arise elsewhere if
global change increases natural disturbance rates. Future climate
mitigation agreements that do not account for and protect against the
impacts of natural disturbances, for example, by accounting for forest
management benefits relative to baselines, will fail to encourage
changes in forest management aimed at mitigating climate change.

Complete article at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/105/5/1551-

Open Access articles are available without fee or subscription payment.

—————————————————————————–

Scientists Facing Increasing Government and and Corporate Repression

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 4, 2008
10:04 AM
CONTACT: Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER)
Carol Goldberg (202) 265-7337

Leaked E-Mails May Sink Arctic Offshore Lease Sales

Officials Scramble to Suppress Scientific Dissent over Bush Arctic Oil
Initiative

WASHINGTON, DC – February 4 – The Interior Department is scrambling to
stanch the flow of internal e-mails from its own scientists that undermine
the legality of its aggressive offshore oil and gas lease sales in federal
Arctic waters, according to correspondence released today by Public
Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). The e-mails belie Bush
administration claims that environmental risks were adequately considered
prior to offering tracts in the Chukchi, Beaufort and Bering Seas for
drilling.

During the past three weeks, PEER has released a series of internal e-mails
from current and former Interior scientists raising troubling questions
about how badly environmental assessments of Arctic offshore oil development
were skewed. These e-mails have fueled two new lawsuits in the past week
that threaten to stymie new lease sales and lend further support to ongoing
litigation against earlier lease sales.

Continue reading