Forest Service Corruption in the Southwest!

———————-
“If the Forest Service wants to retool regional wildlife rules, it
must initiate a formal environmental and public review process,” said
McKinnon. “The law simply doesn’t allow the agency to make unilateral
changes.”
——————————–

For Immediate Release, November 27, 2007

Contact: Taylor McKinnon, Center for Biological Diversity, (928) 310-6713

Forest Service Weakens Wildlife Rules Behind Closed Doors;
Rare Goshawk, Millions of Acres in Arizona and New Mexico Forests Threatened

FLAGSTAFF, Ariz.- Records obtained by the Center for Biological Diversity confirm that the U.S. Forest Service excluded wildlife agencies from the development of controversial new wildlife rules and ignored feedback from non-Forest Service biologists.

“The Forest Service actively ignored criticisms from state biologists and unilaterally changed the rules behind closed doors,” said Taylor McKinnon of the Center for Biological Diversity. “It failed to disclose those criticisms in Freedom of Information Act requests.”

Responding to two Freedom of Information Act requests by the Center, the Forest Service claims that it neither offered nor received feedback on draft copies of the rule from state and federal wildlife agencies. But records obtained through requests to Arizona’s Game and Fish Department contradict Forest Service claims. Those records show that state biologists repeatedly expressed concerns to the Forest Service over the new rules’ impact on wildlife.

The new rules substantially change a 1996 rule governing forest management in all Arizona and New Mexico national forests – a rule that protects northern goshawks and their prey from logging. The previous rules, known as the Goshawk Guidelines, were developed in response to Center litigation and affect the vast majority of ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forest in the Southwest.

The new guidelines would reduce the overall amount of forest cover retained and would increase the amount of large trees and mature forest that can be logged. The new guidelines can reduce forest-cover requirements to as little as 10 percent when measured according to the previous rules’ methods.

“We have grave concerns about the consequences of the new rules for forest wildlife on a regional scale,” said McKinnon.

Pointing to the 1996 rule, which resulted from an extensive public and environmental review, conservationists assert that the Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act and the National Forest Management Act when it modified the old rules without a similar analysis.

“If the Forest Service wants to retool regional wildlife rules, it must initiate a formal environmental and public review process,” said McKinnon. “The law simply doesn’t allow the agency to make unilateral changes.”

The Forest Service’s dictatorial approach marks a sharp departure in regional forest politics, where collaboration and cooperation have replaced animosity and stalemate in efforts to restore the region’s degraded forests – as evidenced by broad participation in, and support for, the White Mountains Stewardship Contract, New Mexico’s Collaborative Forest Restoration Program, the Arizona Forest Restoration Strategy, and New Mexico’s Watershed Restoration Plan.

“By altering the entire forest management framework in Arizona and New Mexico behind closed doors, the Forest Service threatens the delicate agreement that has emerged for restoring the region’s degraded ponderosa pine forests,” said McKinnon. “The new rules deliver a big hit to that spirit of cooperation.”

“Careful efforts that thin small trees and safely restore natural fire in ponderosa forests will continue to enjoy active support from the conservation community,” said McKinnon, “but increasing large-tree logging at the cost of wildlife, as the new guidelines do, will meet with staunch opposition.”

Following their finalization, the Forest Service unveiled the new rules to the public and sister agencies at a workshop in June.

Last week the Center for Biological Diversity won several objection counts against the Southwest’s first forest-management project to explicitly implement the new guidelines, the Jack Smith/Schultz project northeast of Flagstaff. See that press release here.

——————————————————————————————-

Climate Change, Agriculture, & War

—————————————————————————————————
” … they showed that when grain prices reached
a certain level, wars erupted.”
—————————————-

Georgia Institute of Technology Research News
Public release date: 21-Nov-2007

Contact: Abby Vogel
avogel@gatech.edu
404-385-3364

New research shows climate change triggers wars and population decline
Reduced agricultural productivity seems to initiate conflict

Climate change may be one of the most significant threats facing humankind. A new study shows that long-term climate change may ultimately lead to wars and population decline.

The study, published November 19 in the early edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), revealed that as temperatures decreased centuries ago during a period called the Little Ice Age, the number of wars increased, famine occurred and the population declined.

Data on past climates may help accurately predict and design strategies for future large and persistent climate changes, but acknowledging the historic social impact of these severe events is an important step toward that goal, according to the study’s authors.

“Even though temperatures are increasing now, the same resulting conflicts may occur since we still greatly depend on the land as our food source,” said Peter Brecke, associate professor in the Georgia Institute of Technology’s Sam Nunn School of International Affairs and co-author of the study.

This new study expands previous work by David Zhang of the University of Hong Kong and lead author of the study.

“My previous research just focused on Eastern China. This current study covers a much larger spatial area and the conclusions from the current research could be considered general principles,” said Zhang.

Brecke, Zhang and colleagues in Hong Kong, China and the United Kingdom perceived a possible connection between temperature change and wars because changes in climate affect water supplies, growing seasons and land fertility, prompting food shortages. These shortages could lead to conflict – local uprisings, government destabilization and invasions from neighboring regions – and population decline due to bloodshed during the wars and starvation.

To study whether changes in temperature affected the number of wars, the researchers examined the time period between 1400 and 1900. This period recorded the lowest average global temperatures around 1450, 1650 and 1820, each separated by slight warming intervals.

The researchers collected war data from multiple sources, including a database of 4,500 wars worldwide that Brecke began developing in 1995 with funding from the U.S. Institute of Peace. They also used climate change records that paleoclimatologists reconstructed by consulting historical documents and examining indicators of temperature change like tree rings, as well as oxygen isotopes in ice cores and coral skeletons.

Results showed a cyclic pattern of turbulent periods when temperatures were low followed by tranquil ones when temperatures were higher. The number of wars per year worldwide during cold centuries was almost twice that of the mild 18th century.

The study also showed population declines following each high war peak, according to population data Brecke assembled. The population growth rate of the Northern Hemisphere was elevated from 1400-1600, despite a short cooling period beginning in the middle of the 15th century. However, during the colder 17th century, Europe and Asia experienced more wars of great magnitude and population declines.

In China, the population plummeted 43 percent between 1620 and 1650. Then, a dramatic increase in population occurred from 1650 until a cooling period beginning in 1800 caused a worldwide demographic shock.

The researchers examined whether these average temperature differences of less than one degree Celsius were enough to cause food shortages. By assuming that agricultural production decreases triggered price increases, they showed that when grain prices reached a certain level, wars erupted. The ecological stress on agricultural production triggered by climate change did in fact induce population shrinkages, according to Brecke.

Global temperatures are expected to rise in the future and the world’s growing population may be unable to adequately adapt to the ecological changes, according to Brecke.

“The warmer temperatures are probably good for a while, but beyond some level plants will be stressed,” explained Brecke. “With more droughts and a rapidly growing population, it is going to get harder and harder to provide food for everyone and thus we should not be surprised to see more instances of starvation and probably more cases of hungry people clashing over scarce food and water.”

————————————————————————————————–

Longest Walk 30th Anniversary

THE LONGEST WALK 30TH ANNIVERSARY.
FEBRUARY 11- JUNE 11, 2008.
TWO ROUTES TO GO FROM S.F. ­ D.C.
ALL ARE WELCOME!
HEALERS ARE INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FIRST AID STATION TO SUPPORT
THE WALKERS OVER 4,000 MILES ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
DONATIONS ARE NEEDED.

GREETINGS FROM THE LONGEST WALK II MEDICAL COMMITTEE. We take this opportunity to invite you to be part of an historic event. The Longest Walk 2008 will commemorate the 30th anniversary of the original The Longest Walk 1978, which resulted in historic changes for Native America and for our environment. To honor that achievement, TWO great walks are taking place ­a central and a southern route across the country. The purpose of The Longest Walk of 2008 is to raise awareness of the current state of global warming and it’s effects on our world environment & to protect sacred sites. We shall walk for the Seventh Generation, for our youth, for peace, for justice, for healing of Mother Earth, for the healing of our people suffering from diabetes, heart conditions, alcoholism, drug addiction, and other diseases.

THIS TIME AROUND ORGANIZERS ARE PUTTING TOGETHER WELLNESS & FIRST AID STATIONS to support the walkers along the entire route. Our mission for the wellness & first aid station is simply to provide preventative care tips and medical support to the walkers along the way. The first aid station will have a rotating group of volunteers, coordinated by an experienced health care practitioner. We will use a vehicle & other improvised space to provide care to walkers along the five-month journey.

HEALERS WELCOME! The mobile first aid & wellness center invites all kinds of healers & health-care providers to join the walk to share their healing skills with other walkers: those with first aid training, massage therapists, acupuncturists, traditional practitioners, herbalists, EMTs, physical therapists, nurses, doctors, mental health practitioners and more. All people working with the wellness & first aid station are asked to follow a code of ethics: Do no harm; Respect every individuals right to self determination; Work to learn how to share your healing skill in a non-oppressive manner; and Commit to the stated goals of the Longest Walk 2 with respect for Native American leadership. If you have medical skills please tell us a little bit about who you are, your experience and what skill you would feel comfortable sharing.

THE WALKERS NEED FOOD, MEDICAL AND OTHER SUPPLIES FOR THE 4,400 WALK ACROSS THE COUNTRY. Medical supplies that are needed range from herbal medicines, an assortment of bandages, blankets, pillows with waterproof covers, sheets, and other various supplies. The first aid stations also need the use of vehicles, preferably for the entire walk but any portion of the walk will be helpful. Although a hatch-back vehicle would do, a van or bus is ideal for a wonderful mobile first aid station to store supplies at least. Other donations besides medical are needed, such as food and gas money. See our wish list at www.longestwalk.org & contact us for further details.

DONATIONS ARE TAX DEDUCTIBLE. It is a monumental undertaking to move
as many as 1,500 dedicated people across the country. Nightly we will be holding community events, sharing our message and our knowledge. The Longest Walk is funded 100% by financial contributions that come from benefits, and from sponsors who encourage our work and believe in our message. In order For The Longest Walk 2008 to be a success, we encourage you to lend your support.

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US with any question, large or small or for any additional info at LW08MEDICAL@gmail.com by phone at (831) 295-2555 for Aislyn Colgan or (510)-390-5017 for Dixie Block. For further info:

www.longestwalk.org

“Let those who doubt, hear our pledge. Let those who believe, join our ranks. As we walk the final miles, by our side will be elders, families, children, people of all races, from many walks of life, the old and the new America. All Life is Sacred, Clean Up Mother Earth!”
~Longest Walk II Organizers.

Sincerely, The Longest Walk II Medical Team
~ Aislyn Colgan, Greta Montagne, Dixie Block, & Pam Richards

ALERT! Mining In Newe Segobia!

Alert! Alert! Alert!

We need to take a stand against U.S. and corporate destruction of indigenous
lands and spiritual areas NOW. Using laws which continue to stem from the
“doctrine of discovery” – where indigenous peoples were claimed to be
“savages”, “pagans”, and “childlike” in nature, the United States continues
to claim vast areas of native lands as “federal” or “public” lands – denying
Indigenous Nations, like the Western Shoshone, the right to make decisions
about the types of activities allowed in their traditional territories.
Since the days of Columbus, the companies and a pack of elites have been
profiting immensely from this fundamental discrimination against the
original peoples of this land we call the United States.

The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination has
told the United States to stop any new mine permitting on Shoshone lands –
and the corporate entities – in particular Canadian-based Barrick and
U.S.-based Newmont Mining have been told to respect Western Shoshone rights
and stay away from mining in spiritual areas. Have they listened? No –
mining expansions on Shoshone lands are on the rise again affecting burial
areas, spiritual sites, cultural resources, water, wildlife and the natural
environment. When will the greed for gold end – and what is the cost of
this insatiable hunger to all of us? The latest expansion proposal by
Barrick Gold and Kennecott (Australian-based) – ironically named the
“Cortez” project targets an area which is the home of local Shoshone
creation stories and extreme spiritual and cultural significance, Mt.
Tenabo. Coincidentally, the mining industry has also discovered an immense
deposit of gold in the area.

We need to say no – Help us protect this area on Western Shoshone lands from
gold mining! The deadline for comments is coming quickly, please do one of
three things:

1. Sign the online e petition with Oxfam America (Please
sign
the petition today!)
2. Send in your own letter by email, fax or mail- key talking points
below
3. Sign and send in a postcard – attached.

If you want to do more, forward this email to others to take action now AND
take the postcards or the information to meetings, events, etc. to
distribute to your friends, colleagues and others.

PLEASE TAKE ACTION TODAY – What do we have to give thanks for in this
“Holiday” season if we don’t stand alongside the first peoples of the land
in their struggle to protect traditional territories???

Questions – need more info? Contact the Western Shoshone Defense Project at
wsdp@igc.org – 775-744-2565.

Action Alert – Mt. Tenabo in Jeopardy
December 21st deadline for comments

Mt. Tenabo and the surrounding environs are again under attack from gold
mining. It is critical now for the Bureau of Land Management to hear the
strength of opposition for this mine; see talking points and how to send
your comments and concerns below.

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management has released a draft Environmental Impact
Statement, dEIS, which reviews the proposal by Cortez Gold Mines, a
subsidiary of Barrrick Gold Mining Co., to conduct new gold mining
operations at the south end of Crescent Valley in central Nevada. The
Project, although termed as an “expansion” of the existing Pipeline and
Cortez mines, is really a new gold mine complex. It would be located on the
slopes of Mt. Tenabo, a mountain sacred to the Western Shoshone Indians, who
have lived in the area since time immemorial. This mine would:

* Disturb (devastate) 6,792 acres of land, including a heap leach and
waste rock facilities covering much of the Horse Canyon pass just south of
Tenabo, and extending east into Grass Valley
* Blast the new Cortez Hills mine pit approximately 8,900 feet in
length, 6,400 feet in width, and a maximun depth of 2,200 feet
* The pit would be within a few hundred feet of the White Cliffs at
the base of Mt. Tenabo
* Expand an underground mine with a horizontal extent of 1,000 feet
wide by 5,000 feet long
* Pump groundwater from around the pit with an average dewatering rate
of approximately 1.8 billion gallons per year for ten years to keep it dry
for mining
* Create a drop in the water table of 1,600 feet surrounding the pit,
decreasing to 10 feet at 3-4 mile radius of the pit
* Potentially impact the 50 springs and seeps in the project area with
28 in the Horse Canyon area; however, according to the BLM draft analysis
none of the 28 springs are expected to be impacted
* A pit lake will result after mining is completed with an eventual
depth of about 1,000 feet, and according to the BLM draft analysis of
acceptable water quality
* Of the 11 non-Cortex Gold Mine water rights, only one is expected to
recover fully within 100 years after dewatering ceases

It is important to keep in mind that the results of the environmental
analysis presented by the BLM are only estimates. In many mines across
Nevada and elsewhere predicted and actual impacts have varied substantially.
Thus, being critical and skeptical of anticipated impacts is essential to a
good review of this project.

The permanent impact to the cultural and spiritual practices of the Western
Shoshone is undeniable. Mt. Tenabo has been, and continues to be, used by
Western Shoshone people as a central part of their religious practices and
world view. Western Shoshone visit the mountain and the valley below (the
location of the mine pit) for prayer ceremonies, gathering of sacred plants,
fasting, and vision quests, among other uses. The Mountain also contains
Western Shoshone gravesites. All of these values and uses will be destroyed
by the Project. In addition, the massive pumping of groundwater will
dewater sacred springs and streams on and around Mt. Tenabo.

From the draft EIS, “Although not quantifiable, the project area and the
region surrounding the project area have been home to local Indian groups
for centuries, and the resources in the area, the value placed on those
resources, and potential effects to those resources are intertwined with the
culture of local Indian tribes more so than any other population in close
proximity to the project area.”

There is no need for another gold mine in Nevada, especially one that will
destroy such invaluable resources. The BLM has never denied a big mining
project in Nevada. This is one BLM must deny.

In Summary:

* The BLM has ample authority to deny this Project, as it will cause
“undue degradation” of religious, cultural and environmental values.
* The Project will permanently and irreparably destroy current and
future religious practices and values of Western Shoshone people.
* The BLM should prevent any impacts to area springs, waterholes and
streams from dewatering.
* The Draft EIS fails to fully review impacts to these and other
critical resources and should be re-done.

How to take action

The BLM’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement is online at:
http://www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/battle_mountain_field/blm_information/nationa
l_environmental/cortez_hills_expansion.html.

If you write a postcard or letter to BLM, mail it to:

U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Battle Mountain Field Office
Attn: Steve Drummond, Cortez Hills Project Manager
50 Bastian Road
Battle Mountain, NV 89820

If you send an email, it must be emailed before December 21st – email it
today!

stephen_drummond@nv.blm.gov

Sign the online petition with Oxfam America – (see below)

Background on Mt. Tenabo

Mt. Tenabo is located in central Nevada, approximately 20 miles south and a
little west of the town of Crescent Valley. It stands at the intersection
of three valleys, a familiar land mark along major Newe trails, one coming
up Grass Valley from the south and another coming from the west through
Carico Lake Valley and Reese River Valley.

It is an area is an enormously rich cultural and spiritual locus for the
Western Shoshone people since time immemorial. Mt Tenabo Is a significant
landmark on an important north south trail, Dinabo is a place of food and
medicine gathering, a place for refuge and spiritual guidance, a place whose
springs feed the wildlife that feed the people.

Mt. Tenabo is located in central Nevada, approximately 20 miles south and a
little west of the town of Crescent Valley. It stands at the intersection
of three valleys, a familiar land mark along major Newe trails, one coming
up Grass Valley from the south and another coming from the west through
Carico Lake Valley and Reese River Valley.

There is abundant archaeological evidence of Newe occupation since
“prehistoric” times, this evidence of Newe occupation extends through the
historic mining period from 1863 to the 1940’s, with several historic camps
documented containing both grinding stones and more modern “trash.” A map
of Nevada from the late 1860’s identifies the area of Cortez as Shoshone
wells, and the natural spring at this site was later developed by Chinese
workers, whose camp was adjacent to this area. Another Chinese camp is
buried beneath arsenic laden tailings near the Cortez ghost town.

Like all mountains it catches the clouds whose snow and rain feed the
groundwater table and various creeks and streams. The sole spring at
Shoshone wells is the only water source on the west side but several creeks
flow off of its east side into Pine Valley including Horse Canyon creek,
Willow Creek and Four Mile Canyon Creek (flowing off of Mt Tenabo’s unnamed
neighbor to the east). Medicine and food plants are found around the
mountain and include doza, Indian tobacco, water cress, and yomba. Plants
also provide for abundant wildlife including mule dear (over a dozen of
which came within a 1/4 mile of the Shoshone camp during the April 2003
Spring Gathering.) ya-ha, rabbits, bobcats, mountain lions, and many species
of hawks, eagles and birds. An active sage hen (hucha) dancing ground (lek)
is on the eastern flank of the mountain and I believe there is another in
Grass Valley towards Mt Tenabo’s southern end.

Pinion trees and juniper have long been sources of food, fuel and medicine
for the Newe. Pine trees close to the “Shoshone well” are known to local
Shoshone as a place where pitch was gathered to waterproof baskets and for
other uses. Gathering of these things by local Newe continues to the
present day. Hunting, trapping, and gathering of food and medicine occur
throughout the area of Mt Tenabo. Pine forests around the mountain were
almost entirely cut down in the 1870’s to make charcoal for the mine
smelters, but historic miners burrowed underground with shafts, leaving the
soil covering the ground intact. Over time mother earth healed the damage
and the pinion forest has grown back and matured. What will the trees grow
on if the new mine is created?

When Cortez proposed a new mine in the early 1990’s, the Danns and the
Western Shoshone Defense Project (WSDP) opposed this because of both the
unresolved land title issue and the fact that this mine would require
dewatering, threatening the most precious resource out there, the water. In
order to operate, the Pipeline mine must drop the water table over 800 ft at
the mine site, pumping anywhere from 20,000 to 30,000 gallons of water per
minute, 24 hours a day from wells over 1000 feet deep. This deep groundwater
meets drinking water quality standards, with slightly elevated levels of
fluoride as it is warm geothermal water. The mine then pumps it to a series
of shallow ponds and trenches laid out in an arc several miles from the mine
where it soaks this water back into the valley floor. Unfortunately the
soil in the valley floor is full of salts, leftover from the evaporation of
inland lakes and seas. When the clean water is filtered through the salty
soils it is contaminated and no longer meets drinking water standards when
it reaches the water table. The WSDP and its allies in Great Basin Mine
Watch predicted this would happen, but the State and the BLM have allowed it
to continue to this very day.

In addition to water contamination as a result of dewatering, we continue to
be concerned that pumping at the Pipeline mine is affecting groundwater in
the Cortez mountains. Computer modeling done by Cortez indicated that there
would be no waters affected by the pumping farther then a few miles from the
mine site, no surface springs of creeks were predicted to be affected.
However as soon as the pumps were turned on at Pipeline in September 1996,
the old pit lake 7 miles across the valley at the older Cortez mine began to
dry out until finally disappearing after remaining at a static level for a
decade. Initial studies indicated the water table in the bedrock around
Cortez was dropping. The WSDP and Minewatch pressured the BLM and mine to
look into this. Cortez commissioned a study in 1998 to study this. Its
conclusion was that pumping at Pipeline might be affecting the water table
but it was one of several different scenarios the report discussed. Its
final conclusion was that they needed a lot more data to understand what was
going on. A followup study conducted in 1999 reached the same conclusion
that they needed more information. Unfortunately we know of no additional
studies after 1999. This is especially important because in analyzing the
impacts of the Pipeline Mine, the BLM relied upon these models to state that
no surface waters and especially the springs around the flanks of Mt Tenabo
and its adjacent mountains would not be affected by the pumping. If indeed
the pumping is draining the bedrock in the Cortez mountains, that means many
springs and creeks are at risk and that their computer model was fatally
flawed. Of course this would be inconvenient information for Cortez so it
is no surprise that aren’t looking for the answers.

Western Shoshone Defense Project

So-Ho-Bi (South Fork) office:
775-744-2565 (fax and phone)

Main office:
P.O. Box 211308
Crescent Valley, NV 89821
Newe Sogobi
775-468-0230
775-468-0237 (fax)

November 28, 2007

Dear ,

Help
Protect Native American Lands!

The US Bureau of Land Management is currently reviewing a proposal to expand
the Cortez Hills Project. If approved, it would be one of the country’s
largest gold mines. The project would disturb over 6,500 acres of public
land-all of which are considered traditional lands by the Western Shoshone.
We urgently need your help to convince the US government to deny this
proposal.

Click
here to sign our petition calling on the US government to deny further
mining on traditional lands.

The entire area lies within Western Shoshone boundaries of the 1863 Treaty
of Ruby Valley, which recognized Shoshone rights to this land. The area
includes Mount Tenabo, an extremely significant spiritual and cultural area
to the Western Shoshone. Many Shoshone have long expressed deep concerns and
outright opposition to any further exploration on their lands, without their
free, prior, and informed consent. The US Bureau of Land Management is
currently taking comments on this proposal until Dec. 4. We are calling on
our supporters to join with us in signing the petition urging the bureau to
reject this proposal.

Please sign the petition today!

Thank you for standing with Oxfam and the Western Shoshone.

Sincerely,

Tim Fullerton
Oxfam America
Please Forward Widely~
—————————————————————————————————-