Oil Companies Given Clearance to Harass, Annoy, Endanger Polar Bears

Published on Sunday, June 15, 2008 by Associated Press
Oil Companies Get OK To Annoy Bears by Dina Cappiello
WASHINGTON – Less than a month after declaring polar bears a threatened species because of global warming, the Bush administration is giving oil companies permission to annoy and potentially harm them in the pursuit of oil and natural gas.

The Fish and Wildlife Service issued regulations last week providing legal protection to seven oil companies planning to search for oil and gas in the Chukchi Sea off the northwestern coast of Alaska if small numbers of polar bears or Pacific walruses are incidentally harmed by their activities over the next five years.

Environmentalists said the new regulations give oil companies a blank check to harass the polar bear.

About 2,000 of the 25,000 polar bears in the Arctic live in and around the Chukchi Sea, where the government in February auctioned off oil leases to ConocoPhillips Co., Shell Oil Co., and five other companies for $2.6 billion. Over objections from environmentalists and members of Congress, the sale occurred before the bear was classified as threatened in May.

Polar bears are naturally curious creatures and sensitive to changes in their environment. Vibrations, noises, unusual scents, and the presence of industrial equipment can disrupt their quest for prey and their efforts to raise their young in snow dens.

However, the Fish and Wildlife Service said oil and gas exploration will have a negligible effect on the bears’ population.

“The oil and gas industry in operating under the kind of rules they have operated under for 15 years has not been a threat to the species,” H. Dale Hall, the Fish and Wildlife Service’s director, told the Associated Press Friday. “It was the ice melting and the habitat going away that was a threat to the species over everything else.”

The agency made no secret that oil and gas operations would continue in polar bear territory when it announced May 14 that melting sea ice threatened the creatures’ survival. But Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne assured the public that the bear population would not be harmed.

“Polar bears are already protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which has more stringent protections for polar bears than the Endangered Species Act,” Kempthorne said.

Environmentalists already suing the agency over its determination that the bear’s threatened status cannot be used to regulate global warming gases said Kempthorne’s earlier assurances were misleading.

“Now, three weeks later, Interior issues a rule under the act that we view as a blank check to harass the polar bear in the Chukchi Sea,” said Brendan Cummings, oceans program director at the Center for Biological Diversity. He added that his group believes the new regulations are illegal.

Exploring in the Chukchi Sea’s 29.7 million acres will require as many as five drill ships, one or two icebreakers, a barge, a tug, and two helicopter flights per day, according to the government. Oil companies will also be making hundred of miles of ice roads and trails along the coastline.

“We are poorly equipped to address those risks and challenges,” said Steven Amstrup, one of the foremost specialists on polar bears and a scientist at the US Geological Survey’s Alaska Science Center. “To assess what the impacts are going to be, we should know more about the bears.”

Last year, the Marine Mammal Oversight Commission, an independent government agency, told the Fish and Wildlife Service it lacked the information to conclude that exploration will not affect the bear population.

The seven companies will be required to map the locations of polar bear dens, train employees about the bears’ habits, and take other measures to minimize clashes. In exchange, the companies are legally protected if their operations unintentionally harm the bears. Any bear deaths would still warrant an investigation and could result in penalty.

“These rules are essentially an insurance policy,” said Marilyn Crockett, executive director of the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, an industry group that in 2005 requested the new regulation. “They say if you conduct your operations in accordance to the requirement in this rule,” you will not be liable.

© 2008 Associated Press

————————————————————————————-

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.