Massacres and Paramilitary Land Seizures Behind the Biofuel Revolution

Published on Tuesday, June 5, 2007 by the Guardian/UK

Massacres and Paramilitary Land Seizures Behind the Biofuel Revolution

by Oliver Balch / and Rory Carroll

Armed groups in Colombia are driving peasants off their land to make way for plantations of palm oil, a biofuel that is being promoted as an environmentally friendly source of energy.

Surging demand for “green” fuel has prompted rightwing paramilitaries to seize swaths of territory, according to activists and farmers. Thousands of families are believed to have fled a campaign of killing and intimidation, swelling Colombia’s population of 3 million displaced people and adding to one of the world’s worst refugee crises after Darfur and Congo.

Several companies were collaborating by falsifying deeds to claim ownership of the land, said Andres Castro, the general secretary of Fedepalma, the national federation of palm oil producers.

“As a consequence of the development of palm by secretive business practices and the use of threats, people have been displaced and [the businesses] have claimed land for themselves,” he said. His claim was backed up by witnesses and groups such as Christian Aid and the National Indigenous Organisation of Colombia.

The revelations tarnish what has been considered an economic and environmental success story. The fruit of the palm oil tree produces a vegetable oil also used in cooking, employs 80,000 people, and is increasingly being turned into biofuel.

“Four years ago Colombia had 172,000 hectares of palm oil,” President Alvaro Uribe told the Guardian. “This year we expect to finish with nearly 400,000.”

“Four years ago Colombia didn’t produce a litre of biofuel. Today, because of our administration, Colombia produces 1.2m litres per day.” Investment in new installations would continue to boost production, he added.

However the lawlessness created by four decades of insurgency in the countryside has enabled rightwing paramilitaries, and also possibly leftwing rebels, to join the boom. Unlike coca, the armed groups’ main income source, palm oil is a legal crop and therefore safe from state-backed eradication efforts.

Farmers who have been forced off their land at gunpoint say that in many cases their banana groves and cattle grazing fields were turned into palm oil plantations. Luis Hernandez (not his real name) fled his 170-hectare plot outside the town of Mutata in Antioquia province nine years ago after his father-in-law and several neighbours were gunned down. When he and other survivors were able to return recently, they found the land was in the hands of a local palm producer.

“The company tells me that it has legal papers for the land, but I don’t know how that can be, as I have land titles dating back 20 years,” said Mr Hernandez. He suspects palm companies collaborated with the paramilitaries. “I don’t know if there was an official agreement between them, but a relationship of some sort definitely exists.”

A government investigation reportedly found irregularities in 80% of palm oil land titles in some areas. “If there have been abuses and the titles are shown to be false, then the land needs to be returned and all the weight of the law needs to be brought down on those that are responsible,” said Dr Castro, of the producers’ association.

Christian Aid is funding an effort to protect peasants who are trying to reclaim land from the paramilitaries, said Dominic Nutt, who has visited the plantations. “It is the dark side of biofuel.”

The paramilitary groups, first formed in the 80s by businessmen, landowners and drug lords to fend off guerrillas, became a powerful illegal army which stole land, sold drugs and massacred civilians. Under a peace deal with the government they have officially disbanded but many observers say remnants remain active.

Displacement continues, with an average of 200,000 cases registered every year over the past four years, according to the UN High Commission for Refugees, with most coming from palm oil-growing areas on the Caribbean coast. “We can’t keep up, they just keep coming,” said Ludiz Ruda, of the Hijos de Maria school in a shantytown outside the coastal city of Cartagena. Since opening last year it had been swamped with impoverished newcomers, she said. “More than 80% are refugees.”

Cocaine output rises regardless

Coca production in Colombia has surged despite US-funded eradication efforts, according to an estimate that casts fresh doubt on Washington’s “war on drugs”. Satellite imagery collated by the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy survey suggests that cultivation of coca, the raw ingredient of cocaine, jumped 8% last year to 156,000 hectares.

The estimate was made public before a trip to Washington this week by President Alvaro Uribe. If confirmed, it would be the third consecutive rise in production, and a blow to the US strategy of bolstering Colombia’s security forces to help them destroy the crops.

Under its Plan Colombia project, Washington has funnelled more than $5bn (£2.5bn) in mostly military aid to its South American ally since 2000 – its biggest aid project outside Afghanistan and the Middle East. The Democrats say the security forces are accused of human rights abuses and complicity with traffickers.

Mr Uribe revealed the unpublished findings in an effort to get the bad news out of the way before he started lobbying Congress; the White House did not immediately respond.

“They told me they were worried about revealing this number because of my upcoming trip to the United States – that the Americans should reveal it,” he said. “But that’s why I’m revealing it. We’re not trying to put makeup on what is a serious matter.”

Plan Colombia began in 1999 and was supposed to halve production of coca within five years, using sprayer planes and officers on the ground. But the latest estimate suggests that since then it has risen 27%.

Last month Mr Uribe trumpeted a UN report that said cultivation was down to 79,000 hectares. The conflicting figures were incomprehensible and disorienting, said the president: “Could it be we’ve worked in vain? That all our work hasn’t produced the desired results?”

U.S. set to reject targets on climate change

U.S. set to reject targets on climate change: report
By Myra P. Saefong, MarketWatch
Last Update: 2:27 PM ET May 26, 2007

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — The U.S. is set to reject new targets on climate change at next month’s Group of Eight summit, the Associated Press reported Saturday, citing a document released by environmentalists.

That would ruin Germany’s and Britain’s expectations for a new global agreement on carbon emissions, the report said. German Chancellor Angela Merkel wants the meeting to agree on targets for greenhouse gas production cuts and a timetable for an agreement on emissions reduction that would succeed the Kyoto Protocol, AP said. The Kyoto Protocol, which runs through 2012, is an agreement between developed nations to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

But unattributed comments on a draft summit communiqué suggest the White House has serious reservations, the AP news report said. Greenpeace attributed the comments to U.S. officials and said they were given to the group by an undisclosed third party, AP said.

“The U.S. still has serious fundamental concerns about this draft statement,” the notes said, according to AP. “The treatment of climate change runs counter to our overall position and crosses multiple ‘red lines’ tin terms of what we simply cannot agree to.”

The document claims that the White House is ‘fundamentally opposed’ to many of the European objectives.
The 27 European Union members have agreed on a 20% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. The cut would rise to 30% if a broader international pact can be made, the AP said. See MarketWatch’s special report on global warming.
At the June 6-8 Group of Eight summit in Heiligendamm, on Germany’s Baltic Sea coast, Germany’s Merkel wants to win agreements for a global cut in emissions of 50% below 1990 levels by 2050, as well as commitments to energy-efficient strategies, the news agency said.

Myra P. Saefong is a reporter for MarketWatch in San Francisco.

Ethanol Demand Is Boosting Food Prices Worldwide

Rising Corn Prices Hit Grocery Shoppers’ Pocketbooks

Last Updated: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 | 12:16 PM ET

The rising demand for corn as a source of ethanol-blended fuel is largely to blame for increasing food costs around the world, and Canada is not immune, say industry experts.

Food prices rose 10 per cent in 2006, “driven mainly by surging prices of corn, wheat and soybean oil in the second part of the year,” the International Monetary Fund said in a report.

“Looking ahead, rising demand for biofuels will likely cause the prices of corn and soybean oil to rise further,” the authors wrote in the report released last month.

Statistics Canada says consumers in the country paid 3.8 per cent more for food in April 2007, compared to the same month last year. Continue reading

Call to action against coal industry investors on the International Day of Action against Climate Change and the G8

Call to action against coal industry investors on the International Day of Action against Climate Change and the G8

The G8 leaders meeting in Germany behind their fences and soldier are leading us further towards catastrophic and irreversible climate disaster. The time has come to act.

The international day of action against climate change and the G8 has been called by the international rising tide network. This is a call for autonomous, decentralized actions appropriate to your city or region. Use this day of action to support local struggles against oil refineries, gas pipelines, strip mines, coal fired power plants, airport expansion, new roads, and financial backers. Actions are planned throughout the G8 countries and around the world. For more information including the full call to action check out www.risingtidenorhtamerica.org and www.risingtide.org.uk

The coal industry like, all industries relies on massive investments from Wall Street and international financial institutions such as Bank of America and Citigroup. They fund everything from strip mines, to the newest wave of dirty coal plants. Without these massive influxes of capital, coal companies would be severely restricted in their ability to maintain and expand their destructive extraction operations. Rising Tide North America is calling for actions against the financial backers of coal companies on June 8th in solidarity with the G8 protests in Germany and against the root causes of climate change. Targeting banks and investors is an easy and direct way to lend solidarity to communities fighting against the devastation of their homelands by greedy coal corporations. Below is a by no means comprehensive list of investors:

Bank of America:

Major subsidiaries and brands: MBNA Credit Cards, FleetBoston Bank

2006 Revenue: $117 billion

Headquarters: Charlotte, NC

CEO: Ken Lewis

Website: http://www.bankofamerica.com

Known Recent Financial Involvement with the following coal and power companies:

Alpha Natural Resources, Cleco Corp, Consol Energy (CNX), Florida Power & Light, Foundation Coal Holdings, International Coal Group, Massey Energy, Peabody Energy, WPS Resources.
Citi Inc.

Major subsidiaries and brands: Citigroup, CitiCorp, Smith Barney, Diners Club Credit Cards, CitiCard Credit Cards, Primerica, BanaMex.
Headquarters: New York, NY
2006 Revenues: $146 billion
CEO: Charles “Chuck” Prince
Web Site: http://www.citigroup.com

Known Recent Financial Involvement with the following coal and power companies:

Alpha Natural Resources, Ameren, Arch Coal, American Electric Power, China Coal Energy Company, Consol Energy (CNX), Dominion Resources, Duke Energy, Dynegy, Florida Power & Light, Foundation Coal Holdings, LS Power, Massey Energy, Mid-American Energy, NRG Energy, Ohio Edison Electric (FirstEnergy), Peabody Energy, PPL Energy, Rio Tinto, Southern Company TXU, Xcel Energy, WPS Resources.

Credit Suisse:

Headquarters: New York, NY, with parent offices in Zurich, Switzerland
2006 Revenues: $7 billion (US arm only)
CEO: Brady W. Dougan
Web Site: http://www.credit-suisse.com/

Known Recent Financial Involvement with the following coal and power companies:

American National Power (International Power) Duke Energy, Dynegy, LS Power, MidAmerican Energy, Ohio Edison Electric (FirstEnergy), Peabody Energy, PPL Energy, TXU.

Goldman Sachs:

Headquarters: New York, NY
2006 Revenues: $69 billion
CEO: Lloyd C. Blankfein
Web Site: http://www.gs.com/

Known Recent Financial Involvement with the following coal and power companies:

American National Power (International Power), Cleco Corp, Duke Energy, Energy Capital Partners, GenPower Holdings, LS Power, Massey Energy, Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, Sierra Pacific Resources (Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific Power), Southwestern Electric Power, (American Electric Power), TXU, Xcel Energy. International Coal Group,

JP Morgan Chase:

Major subsidiaries and brands: JP Morgan & Co. merged with Chase Manhattan in 2000. Merged with Bank One of Chicago in 2004. Pier 1 National Bank

Headquarters: New York, NY
2006 Revenues: $61 billion
CEO: Jamie Dimon
Web Site: http://www.jpmorganchase.com

Known Recent Financial Involvement with the following coal and power companies:

Consol Energy (CNX), Dayton Power & Light, Dynegy, Great River Energy, International Coal Group, LS Power, MidAmerican Energy, Mirant, Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, Peabody Energy, TXU, Unisource Energy.

Lehman Brothers:

CEO: Richard S. Fuld.

Headquarters: New York City, NY

2006 Revenues: $46 billion

Website: http://www.lehman.com/

Known Recent Financial Involvement with the following coal and power companies:

Alpha Natural Resources, Arch Coal, Dynegy, Florida Power & Light, International Coal Group, Peabody Energy, Sierra Pacific Resources (Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific Power) Southwestern Electric Power, (American Electric Power), TXU, Xcel Energy,

Merrill Lynch:

Major subsidiaries and brands: 49% owner in BlackRock Inc, one of the largest investors in climate-damaging energy industries worldwide.
Headquarters: New York, NY
2006 Revenues: $70 billion
CEO: Stan O’Neal
Web Site: http://ww.ml.com

Known Recent Financial Involvement with the following coal and power companies:

Alpha Natural Resources, BlackRock Inc. LS Power, Sierra Pacific Resources (Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific Power).

Morgan Stanley:

Major subsidiaries and brands: Dean Witter, Discover Credit Card.
Headquarters: New York, NY
2006 Revenues: $76 billion
CEO: John Mack
Web Site: http://www.morganstanley.com

Known Recent Financial Involvement with the following coal and power companies:

Alpha Natural Resources, American National Power (International Power), DPL Inc., Dynegy, China Coal Energy Company, Duke Energy, Florida Power & Light, International Coal Group, LS Power, James River Coal, Peabody Energy, TXU, Xcel Energy, Wisconsin Electric.

Wells Fargo:

Headquarters: San Francisco, CA
2006 Revenues: $35 billion
CEO: Richard Kovacevich
Web Site: http://www.wellsfargo.com/

Known Recent Financial Involvement with the following coal and power companies:

Alpha Natural Resources, Consol Energy (CNX), MidAmerican Energy, Peabody Energy, Unisource Energy, Xcel Energy