Demanding the Impossible: Saying “No Compromise” in the Climate Movement, And Meaning It

shutterstock_291913025Cross-posted from Counterpunch

“The earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have names and addresses.”

— Utah Phillips

In the summer of 2003, my friends and I launched a campaign called Dirty South Earth First! (DSEF!) that targeted the executives of financial holding company MAXXAM in their ostensibly safe gated communities in suburban Houston. MAXXAM was the parent company of Pacific Lumber (PALCO) which spent decades logging the majestic Redwoods of Northern California.

MAXXAM’s CEO Charles Hurwitz bought PALCO and escalated the logging of Northern California for higher profit and the need to pay off the debt from the acquisition. Hurwitiz had a history of financial misdeeds including the raiding of worker pensions from other companies he’d bought and crashing a Savings and Loans costing U.S. tax-payers $1.6 billion during the financial crisis of the late 1980s.

Forest defenders in Northern California fought long and hard at the point of destruction in the lush forests of Northern California with tree-sits and road blockades. These fights against MAXXAM and Pacific Lumber had a long and sorted history. They included “Redwood Summer,” a mass direct action campaign organized by Judy Bari, which led to a pipe bomb being planted in Bari’s car in 1990, the death of forest defender David “Gypsy” Chain, who died when a tree was felled on him by loggers in 1998 and a yearlong tree-sit by celebrity Julia Butterfly Hill in 1999.

We humorously nicknamed the campaign “Dirt First! after a Simpsons’ episode where Lisa sits in a tree to save Springfield’s last Redwood, but took our campaign very serious as we had the lofty “No Compromise” goals of MAXXAM divesting from PALCO and ending clearcutting operations in Northern California.

The DSEF! campaign utilized a different strategy to pressure MAXXAM into stopping the devastation. It was modeled on the Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty (SHAC) campaign which included the targeting individual executives with “naming and shaming” tactics at their homes, their places of worship, their communities and in their personal lives. SHAC had been an effective animal rights campaign that bankrupted the world’s largest animal testing company, Huntington Life Sciences, a number of times as well as getting them delisted from the New York Stock Exchange. Eventually governments in Britain and the United States intervened with financial bailouts for Huntington, prosecuting SHAC organizers and sending them to federal prison.

That summer, our first wave of actions began with two very distinct tactics: a symbolic tree-sit in Memorial Park, a large urban Houston park near Hurwitz’s home led by North Coast Earth First!ers who’d been on the frontlines of resistance to PALCO’s logging; and home demonstrations and other “naming and shaming” tactics targeting MAXXAM’s top corporate officers. The tree-sit captured the attention of the local media while the personalized protests send shockwaves into MAXXAM’s corporate elite and their neighbors.

While the tree-sit ended by the end of the summer, the “SHAC-tics” against MAXXAM’s execs lasted for over a year. While other campaigns compromised with Pacific Lumber and other logging companies for a kindler gentler form of logging of Northern California’s Redwoods, we offered an uncompromising approach. DSEF! was not only ignored, shunned or denounced by more mainstream environmentalists (shocking, I know), but within Earth First! community as well.  Our tactics left many uncomfortable in the forest defense movements.

As my DSEF! co-organizer scott crow has said “We weren’t being vanguardist, but just pushing the edge of where political action might go. The radical enviro movement had really lost its militancy and was comfortable in the forms of resistance like blockades and tree-sits. I’m not knocking those, but corporations and the state had adapted to them and expected them. When we stepped in, it was outside the EF! norm.”

Our goal for Dirty South Earth First! was to be a more widespread campaign that targeted companies doing business with our targets. That didn’t work. Our capacity and resources only allowed the campaign to be effective at local actions in Houston. DSEF! eventually burned out due to that lack of growth of a wider campaign. Furthermore, repression by the state played a role as well.  We later learned that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had an in the Houston activist community reporting on us regularly and MAXXAM had private security that monitored our activities.

Clearcutting in the Redwoods continued, but a number of MAXXAM executives ended up leaving the company or relocating to more secure gated communities (which we still protested). Not long after DSEF! folded, Pacific Lumber declared bankruptcy and relinquished the land, thus saving the last few remaining Redwoods. DSEF! played a small role in these turn of events, but the loss of forest, wilderness and biodiversity for corporate profit was beyond cost.

Moving forward over the past 12 years with the hard lessons of Dirty South Earth First!, I’ve been an active participant in the North American direct action movements against the extraction of oil, coal and natural gas with the explicit goal of supporting those on the frontlines of fossil fuel extraction and keeping all fossil fuels in the ground. The demand of “No Compromise” continues to evade mainstream environmental organizations who seek a redress of climate grievances in the corporate dominated political status quo.

The most recent (and biggest, to date) example of the failure of mainstream liberal and environmental compromise came during the 21st United Nations Conference of Parties (COP21) climate talks in Paris. The agreement, signed by nearly 200 nations, failed to address the most pressing issues facing the climate and global communities. It sent a powerful message that the governments of the world are committed to participating in the carbon emissions trading economy, not addressing a low-carbon future or keeping fossil fuels in the ground. The agreement states its goal is to limit temperature increases to 1.5 degrees, but shows no tangible mechanisms to deliver such a lofty goal. Furthermore, negotiators removed the rights of Indigenous people and reparations for those impacted by climate change in the Global South.

Hailed as a triumph by politicians such as French President Francois Hollande, UN General Secretary Ban Ki-moon and Barack Obama, the mainstream environmental non-profit complex followed suit: Sierra Club (“a turning point for humanity”), Environmental Defense (a transformative moment”),  Natural Resources Defense Council (“A great tide has turned”), and Avaaz (“Victory! The end of fossil fuels has begun…”).  The environmental establishment continues to support the politicians that perpetuate notions of unrealistic action on climate change, climate injustice and social inequality.

In contrast, a broad spectrum of voices from the scientific community to frontline groups to grassroots direct action groups pronounced the agreement an epic failure. U.S. climatologist James Hanson called the agreement “bullshit” and added ‘we’ll have a 2C warming target and then try to do a little better every five years.’ It’s just worthless words.” UK climate scientist Kevin Anderson of Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research called the agreement “weaker than Copenhagen” and inconsistent with current science. Noted British climate campaigner and policy expert George Monbiot said “by comparison to what it could have been, it’s a miracle. By comparison to what it should have been, it’s a disaster.”

The Climate Justice Alliance, a coalition of North American frontline and climate justice groups, called the Paris Agreement “a failure for humanity.” They further stated that market based mechanisms from “cap and trade in California, to the carbon trading requirements of the Clean Power Plan,” particularly in the United States and Canada, to offset catastrophic climate change is “blind to the stark realities of climate crisis.” Anti-capitalist climate justice group Rising Tide North America articulated that the agreement was “exploitive, deceitful and hollow, favoring the rights and voices of corporations over people.

The marketplace had its own opinions about Paris. Wall Street banks joined the climate action early with investments in renewable energy and pledging to drop losing industries like coal mining, while still funding coal power plants and the oil and gas industries. Goldman Sachs got in line with the Obama-Big Green public relations strategy and called the outcome in Paristhe most ambitious climate deal since 1997.

But, the oil industry saw some fallout from Paris. Exxon declared they expect to see a permanent decrease in its stock value after the agreement. West Texas crude prices dropped to $34 a barrel and are expected to dip as low as $20 a barrel. Also, Exxon also had a 37% drop in revenues this quarter from this same time in 2014.

But oil and gas trade associations don’t see it impeding long term oil and gas development. During COP21, the Obama administration signed legislation to allow the continuing expansion of infrastructure. The Exxon-Koch Industries backed FAST (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation) Act that permits the expediting of federal permits on oil and gas pipelines. This is at least partially in response to the “Keystone-ization” of fossil fuel projects by environmentalists and local communities. Furthermore, emails and documents obtained by reporter Steve Horn revealed that the U.S. International Trade Agency facilitated and promoted business deals for the Liquefied Natural Gas industry and export terminal owners before federal agencies had approved permits.

The coal industry took a harder line on the agreement when Brian Ricketts, the head of the European coal lobby, said that the Paris agreement would lead to the coal industry being vilified “like slave traders.” After the agreement, the world’s largest coal company Peabody Energy took at 12% stock hit and Consol Energy saw its stock fall 3%. In the United States, regulation, environmental campaigns, the proliferation of renewables and the price of gas have hurt the industry, but nations like Australia and Indonesia continue to export vast amounts of it. Furthermore, worldwide, the equivalent of over 350,000 megawatts in new coal power generation is under construction or approaching approval for construction.  Like Yogi Berra said “it ain’t over until it’s over.

Meanwhile, the planet continues to react to the emission of greenhouse gases by human activity with rapidly changing weather patterns and large scale natural disasters. At the end of December, the North Pole saw a 60 degree spike in temperatures making the region warmer than many cities in North America and Europe. In South American countries like Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay saw floods touched off by El Nino displace 150,000 people. In Southern Africa, 29 million people are expected to face critical food shortages due to drought. In the Middle East, temperatures spiked from Egypt to Syria. In Pakistan, the heatwaves took 2,000 lives and in India, 2,500. Arctic eco-systems are being impacted by a warming world with melting ice, endangered wildlife and impacted Indigenous communities.

Global levels of carbon in the atmosphere averaged around 400 parts per million (ppm) for the entire month of March 2015. The scientific community tells us that if not returned to at least 350 ppm than climate catastrophe will only continue to grow in scale and extremity. Nature doesn’t compromise in the same way as political systems. Or really at all.

As daunting as it sounds the gross agenda of industry, banks and compromised political and not for profit institutions can still be undercut and the worst impacts of the climate and environmental crisis mitigated. Most importantly, the poisoning and polluting of communities on the frontlines of environmental disaster can be stopped. Through history, we’ve seen movements for equality, justice and ecological sanity build power and take on the agenda of the corporations and the politicians that love them.

After Paris, Obama, the Democrats, the liberal environmental establishment and governments around the world will defend the Paris narrative that the COP21 agreement is an effective solution to climate change. But, our fight is far from over. There are tangible institutions responsible for fossil fuel extraction, infrastructure and combustion. As noted above, industry has learned the lessons of Keystone XL and begun to shift rules and regulations to make resistance more difficult. Furthermore, movements will encounter an increasingly unaccountable police and corporate surveillance state.

In the face of these new obstacles, our organizing must take the small disparate pieces of the existing climate movement and grow them exponentially to become a fierce, more militant, counterbalance to the industry.

Ongoing lessons when fighting for climate justice:

System Change: We can’t lose sight that each action and campaign is pushing us towards system change. The existing political economy is hardwired in anti-democratic and exploitive behavior. Stopping a pipeline, a coal company or ending the clearcutting of the Redwoods is not enough. We must continue to fight for greater system change. Fight corporations. Fight capitalism.

Revoking the social and political license of fossil fuels: We must utilize strategies that create an environment so toxic for the climate pollution industry, its executives, its politicians and the financial institutions that back them that business as usual becomes impossible. Enough said.

More militant tactics: In 2012, the Tar Sands Blockade held an 80 day tree-sit and organized dozens of actions disrupting construction on the Keystone XL pipeline costing oil company TransCanada millions of dollars. In Peru, social movements are fighting mining projects with militant street tactics and sabotage of machinery.  This past weekend, Black Lives Matter Cleveland went to the home District Attorney Tim McGinty, who refused to indict police officers who’d killed 12 year old Tamir Rice, demanding his resignation. Tactics costing corporations, political institutions and the individuals that run them economic and social capital are effective. Be bold, be militant and escalate.

Harness Rebel Energy: Non-profits, Democratic politicians, groups with big mailing lists, socialist senators from Vermont and various other manifestations of the existing political system are not the movement.  The momentum to stop climate change is going to come from the rebel energy that operates outside the current political system. Author and activist George Lakey penned in the pamphlet The Sword That Heals: “You can’t pull off powerful nonviolent direct action without rebel energy. You’ve run this campaign as a conventional lobbying operation and you can’t — at the last minute — switch gears and become a nonviolent protest movement!

In many ways, Dirty South Earth First! is an important example for environmental radicals taking action on a villainous target with uncompromising  goals. It gives a broader analysis of environmental destruction, corporate power and how to strategically move these bigger institutions.

It is very clear that people are hungry for action. The brushfire rebellion against fossil fuels continues to burn. Folks are organizing against oil pipelines, fracking, export terminals and coal every day across North America. The part to remember is that these campaigns require effective strategies and uncompromising goals. In the words of a previous generation on the streets of Paris: “Be realistic, demand the impossible.”

Scott Parkin is a climate organizer working with Rising Tide North America. You can follow him on Twitter at @sparki1969

Protesters Arrested Stopping Work at Denton’s New Fracking Site

day 2MEDIA RELEASE: June 2, 2015

Contact: Elida Tamez, 940-367-2159

For Live Updates: Follow @BPRisingTide on Twitter, Blackland Prairie Rising Tide on Facebook

Protesters Arrested Stopping Work at Denton’s New Fracking Site

DENTON, TX – June 2, 2015 -Today, three more citizens of Denton were arrested in an act of civil disobedience after refusing leave Vantage Energy’s new fracking site. Gathering with several dozen other community members at the site, the three intentionally refused to leave the driveway to the drilling area after police dispersal orders were issued with the intention of stopping work.

“I want to enforce our fracking ban and I believe that democracy is not being served,” said Elida Tamez, a former University of North Texas employee who was among those arrested, “I’m very angry at the state legislature because the people have voted and majority rules. I’m doing it because I feel that it is a very unjust situation at hand.”

Today’s action taken by the three citizens comes just a day after three others were arrested for also refusing to leave the site. The ongoing protests come just after the passage of HB 40, which overturned Denton’s ban on hydraulic fracturing. In November the citizens of Denton voted for the ban in a landslide vote. Less than 48 hours after the ban was declared unenforceable, Colorado based Vantage Energy announced that they would bring fracking back to Denton at the site located directly across the street from a neighborhood and several businesses.

day 2 2“I chose not to move after receiving a dispersal order from the police. I participated in civil disobedience not only because of environmental and health reasons but also because of the threat to our democracy that HB 40 poses,” said Jonathon Vann, a long-time resident and Frack Free Denton volunteer arrested today. “The will of the people must be respected and that is why I refused to stand aside today.”

Despite claims to be a “good neighbor” to the people living near the site, community members are concerned with the company’s record on public safety. On May 7 it was a Vantage well that was struck by lightning in Denton, which then burned off for over 7 hours while firefighters awaited Vantage’s emergency response team. On April 11, a serious mishap happened during the fracking process in Arlington, Texas causing a blowout at the well and forced 115 homes to be evacuated.

“Last November I took part in one of our country’s most authentic expressions of democracy. A popular referendum,” said Rodney Love, a longtime resident and small-business owner. “Despite overwhelming odds, our city voted to restrict future hydraulic fracturing within our city limits. We chose together to protect our water, air, and the health of our children. I stand with my fellow citizens to protect our right to decide what is best for our community within a free democracy.”

###

Denton Residents Defend Fracking Ban, Blockade Site of First New Frack Well

Media Release: June 1, 2015

bprt 2Contact: Tara Linn Hunter, 806-535-2012

For Live Updates: Follow @BPRisingTide on Twitter, Blackland Prairie Rising Tide on Facebook

Denton Residents Defend Fracking Ban, Blockade Site of First New Frack Well

DENTON, TX — MONDAY, JUNE 1, 2015– Attempts to drill the first new frack well since Denton residents voted to pass a fracking ban last November have been met with acts of civil resistance. 3 local community members and volunteers with the Frack Free Denton movement blockaded the gates of fracking operator Vantage Energy’s newest well pad in defense of the city ordinance that nearly 60 percent of residents supported at the ballot box.

“How could I sleep at night or look my children in the eyes if I was not here today to mark, with my body as well as my words, this injustice?” Said Adam Briggle, a 37 year old father of two who was arrested for trespassing after blocking the frack site entrance with his body and refusing to leave.

bprt“I have more of a responsibility to do what is right than to comply with an unjust law that directly harms my neighbors and my own family,” said Tara Linn Hunter, volunteer coordinator of the Frack Free Denton movement and cofounder of the musical troupe The Frackettes, whose satirical videos have tens of thousands of views. “ We are no longer pleading with the oil soaked state politicians who have sold us out at the cost of our health and safety. We are taking direct action to enact the will of the people who voted fracking out of our community.”

With the recent passage of HB40, a law that preempts all local control of oil and gas production across Texas, Vantage Energy claims to have legal authority to frack within the city limits of Denton. “A just law would give those exposed to the harms of fracking a meaningful voice. An unjust law would subordinate those voices to the dictates of the powerful and wealthy. HB40 is an unjust law,” stated Briggle.

Also arrested was Niki Chochrek, another member of the Frackettes and a long time Frack Free Denton volunteer. “I believe our community has the right to defend itself from imminent threats,” she said. “The legislature in Austin wants us to believe that we must stand aside and allow ourselves to be poisoned by this reckless industry. I refuse to stand aside, and I believe most people in Denton feel the same way.”

Accompanying the 3 blockaders were a group of supporters who also blockaded the fracking gates until being dispersed by police. Supporters brought several banners, including one with the language of Denton’s fracking ban written large. “Sec.14.201 Prohibition of Hydraulic Fracturing. It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in hydraulic fracturing within the corporate limits of the City.”

###

Climate justice groups call for mass actions in lead up to Paris climate talks

fTSFor Immediate Release: May 20th, 2015

Contact:

Scott Parkin, +1.415.235.0596

Keith Brunner, +1.802.363.9615

Climate justice groups call for mass actions in lead up to Paris climate talks

Rising Tide North America and allies today launched a call to “Flood the System” through a series of coordinated mass actions across the US and Canada in the leadup to the United Nations COP21 climate negotiations in Paris this fall. [1]

Organizers claim that the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) process has been co-opted by elite interests and that any Paris outcomes will be insufficient to meaningfully address the climate crisis and ensure justice for the majority of the world’s people.

From September to the end of November, Flood the System envisions an escalating series of direct actions and demonstrations targeting the economic and political systems at the root of the crisis, inspired by recent movements led by low-wage workers, immigrants, and communities responding to police brutality.

Plans are already coming together from New England to the Pacific Northwest, where organizers hosted a “festival of resistance” this week involving a massive blockade of the terminal where the port of Seattle is hosting Royal Dutch Shell’s arctic drilling fleet.

“Communities on the front lines of fossil fuel extraction are fighting back,” said Ahmed Gaya, an organizer with Rising Tide Seattle. “From Seattle, to Alberta, to Appalachia, people are organized in opposition to extraction, and taking action to uproot the systems driving the crisis.”

Rising Tide NYC organizer Sandy Nurse said, “Last September four hundred thousand of us were in the streets of New York for the People’s Climate March. The next day, thousands joined the Flood Wall Street march and sit-in, shutting down the heart of global capitalism. Now it’s time to join with and support other movements in rapidly escalating the pace and scale of our resistance to the level of the crises we’re facing.” [2]

NOTES FOR EDITORS

1] https://floodthesystem.net

2] http://www.democracynow.org/2014/9/23/flood_wall_street_100_arrested_at

###

Rising Tide North America is a grassroots climate justice network with over 50 chapters, local contacts and ally groups in Canada, Mexico and the United States confronting the root causes of climate change.